Literature DB >> 9836167

Are subjective clinical findings and objective clinical tests related to the motion characteristics of low back pain subjects?

A H McGregor1, C J Doré, I D McCarthy, S P Hughes.   

Abstract

Many authors have demonstrated that low back pain sufferers have impaired spinal motion. However, it is not known to what degree the patient's signs and symptoms influence this impairment in motion. The aim of this study was therefore to conduct an explorative study to investigate the relationship between low back pain patients' signs and presenting symptoms and objective measurements of motion. One hundred thirty-eight patients with low back pain completed a questionnaire detailing their signs and symptoms and underwent a full clinical examination. A potentiometric motion analysis system of known accuracy and repeatability was used to measure their spinal motion during a flexion-extension test. The effects of a variety of subjective and clinical findings on the motion characteristics were examined, which revealed that certain factors, such as diagnosis, pain characteristics, symptom severity, and level of disruption, were related to the resulting motion measurements. The strength of these relationships were not as strong as anticipated (accounting for 16-45% of the variability). This suggests that routine objective assessments cannot be used as a substitute for a thorough physical and subjective examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9836167     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.6.370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  6 in total

1.  Paravertebral spinal injection for the treatment of patients with degenerative facet osteoarthropathy: Evidence of motor performance improvements based on objective assessments.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Homayoon Harati; Tzu-Chuan Yen; Cindy Fastje; Jane Mohler; Bijan Najafi; Michael Dohm
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Gait behaviors as an objective surgical outcome in low back disorders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Tzu Chuan Yen; Carol Howe; Michael Dohm; Jane Mohler; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Back extensor muscle fatigue in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Pre-operative and post-operative analysis of electromyography, endurance time and subjective factors.

Authors:  Asa Dedering; Karin Harms-Ringdahl; Gunnar Nèmeth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [How reliable are statements on extensive noninflammatory pain? Comparison of patients with fibromyalgia, backache, and other local pain].

Authors:  R Dohrenbusch; L Sampaio-Doherty; E Genth
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Can a self-administered questionnaire identify workers with chronic or recurring low back pain?

Authors:  Karina Satiko Takekawa; Josiane Sotrate Gonçalves; Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury; Tatiana de Oliveira Sato
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.179

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.