Literature DB >> 19271782

Penetration of antibacterials into bone: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and bioanalytical considerations.

Cornelia B Landersdorfer1, Jürgen B Bulitta, Martina Kinzig, Ulrike Holzgrabe, Fritz Sörgel.   

Abstract

Antibacterials play a key role in the treatment of bone infections and appropriate surgical prophylaxis. The rate and extent of penetration of antimicrobials into bone has been assessed and shown to be important for successful treatment in numerous studies. However, no recent review or critical evaluation of the analytical techniques is available. This review compares established and new sample preparation and analytical methods to measure bone concentrations. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference abstracts and references from published articles on bone penetration of antibacterials. This article focuses on the standardization of drug analysis in bone, the extent and rate of bone penetration of antibacterials, and the design, evaluation and reporting techniques of pharmacokinetic studies of bone penetration. The focus is on studies conducted between 1998 and 2007, since a previous review was published in 1999. WinNonlin Professional version 5.0.1 software was used for statistics. Very different methods for sample preparation, drug analysis, data handling and reporting have been employed in bone penetration studies. There is substantial variability in the reported mean bone penetration between drugs and between different studies of the same drug. Quinolones, macrolides and linezolid have mean bone : serum concentration ratios that are commonly between 0.3 and 1.2, and higher ratios have been found for azithromycin (bone concentration in mg/kg of total bone). The ratios are usually between 0.15 and 0.3 for cephalosporins and glycopeptides, and between 0.1 and 0.3 for penicillins. Cephalosporins and penicillins have shown significantly lower (p < 0.05) concentration ratios than linezolid. For 20 of 25 different drugs, the ratios were higher for cancellous bone than for cortical bone. The available data show a larger extent of bone penetration for quinolones, macrolides and linezolid than for beta-lactams. The bone penetration of penicillins and cephalosporins was significantly lower than that of linezolid. Guidelines on sample preparation, drug analysis, study design and pharmacokinetic evaluation of bone penetration studies are vitally needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271782     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200948020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  177 in total

1.  Regional and systemic prophylaxis with teicoplanin in total knee arthroplasty: a tissue penetration study.

Authors:  Luca Lazzarini; Andrea Novelli; Nicola Marzano; Lia Timillero; Stefania Fallani; Renato Viola; Fausto de Lalla
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Miokamycin penetration into oral cavity tissues and crevicular fluid.

Authors:  F Fraschini; F Scaglione; M Falchi; P Manzoni; S D'Orsi; S Badile; M Pignanelli
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Res       Date:  1989

3.  Penetration of amoxycillin and clavulanic acid into bone.

Authors:  R J Grimer; M R Karpinski; J M Andrews; R Wise
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.544

4.  Clinical pharmacology of cefotaxime including penetration into bile, sputum, bone and cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  J Kosmidis; C Stathakis; K Mantopoulos; T Pouriezi; B Papathanassiou; G K Daikos
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Cephradine penetration of mandibular bone.

Authors:  R J Middlehurst; J Pedlar; G R Barker; J P Rood
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  [Investigation of panipenem/betamipron levels in sera and various tissues in patients of orthopedic surgery].

Authors:  K Kurata
Journal:  Jpn J Antibiot       Date:  1992-02

7.  A comparison of the penetration of cefuroxime and cephamandole into bone, fat and haematoma fluid in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Authors:  A M Lovering; J Perez; K E Bowker; D S Reeves; A P MacGowan; G Bannister
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Amoxicillin concentrations in serum, jaw cyst, and jawbone following a single oral administration.

Authors:  Y Akimoto; K Kaneko; T Tamura
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Flucloxacillin in bone.

Authors:  P F Unsworth; F W Heatley; I Phillips
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  [Availability of cefotaxime. Pharmacokinetic studies on the distribution in central and various peripheral compartments (author's transl)].

Authors:  D H Wittmann; H H Schassan; J Welter; H Seidel
Journal:  MMW Munch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1980-04-25
View more
  82 in total

1.  Ertapenem for osteoarticular infections in obese patients: a pharmacokinetic study of plasma and bone concentrations.

Authors:  Jonathan Chambers; Madhu Page-Sharp; Sam Salman; John Dyer; Timothy M E Davis; Kevin T Batty; Laurens Manning
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A retrospective comparison of ceftriaxone versus oxacillin for osteoarticular infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Brent W Wieland; Jodie R Marcantoni; Kerry M Bommarito; David K Warren; Jonas Marschall
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  [Orthopaedic implant-associated infections: Update of antimicrobial therapy].

Authors:  W Zimmerli
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Treatment algorithms for chronic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Gerhard Walter; Matthias Kemmerer; Clemens Kappler; Reinhard Hoffmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Penetration of antibacterials into bone: what do we really need to know for optimal prophylaxis and treatment of bone and joint infections?

Authors:  Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Relevance of antibacterial distribution: the particular case of bone penetration.

Authors:  Amparo Sánchez Navarro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  [Vertebral osteomyelitis].

Authors:  N Jung; H Seifert; J Siewe; G Fätkenheuer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Challenges in recognition and diagnosis of yaws in children in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Oriol Mitjà; Russell Hays; Francis Lelngei; Nedley Laban; Anthony Ipai; Slim Pakarui; Quique Bassat
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  Polymer-controlled release of tobramycin from bone graft void filler.

Authors:  Amanda E Brooks; Benjamin D Brooks; Sherry N Davidoff; Paul C Hogrebe; Mark A Fisher; David W Grainger
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 10.  Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis: Bone, Bugs, and Surgery.

Authors:  Kenneth L Urish; James E Cassat
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.