Literature DB >> 9817202

Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on cognitive maps but not heading vectors.

J M Pearce1, A D Roberts, M Good.   

Abstract

Animals can find a hidden goal in several ways. They might use a cognitive map that encodes information about the geometric relationship between the goal and two or more landmarks. Alternatively, they might use a heading vector that specifies the direction and distance of the goal from a single landmark. Rats with damage to the hippocampus have difficulty in finding a hidden goal. Here we determine which of the above strategies is affected by such damage. Rats were required to swim in a water maze to a submerged platform, which was always at the same distance and direction from a landmark. The platform and landmark remained in the same place for the four trials of each session, but they were moved to a new position at the start of a session. Rats with damage to the hippocampus found the platform more efficiently than did normal rats in the first trial of a session but, in contrast to normal rats, their performance did not improve during a session. Our results indicate that hippocampally damaged rats are able to navigate by means of heading vectors but not cognitive maps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9817202     DOI: 10.1038/23941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  57 in total

1.  Path integration absent in scent-tracking fimbria-fornix rats: evidence for hippocampal involvement in "sense of direction" and "sense of distance" using self-movement cues.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; B Gorny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Competition among spatial cues in a naturalistic food-carrying task.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Hippocampus is required for paired associate memory with neither delay nor trial uniqueness.

Authors:  Jinah Yoon; Yeran Seo; Jangjin Kim; Inah Lee
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Visual spatial cognition in neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 0.881

5.  A computational model of parallel navigation systems in rodents.

Authors:  Ricardo Chavarriaga; Thomas Strösslin; Denis Sheynikhovich; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2005

6.  The hippocampus and flexible spatial knowledge in rats.

Authors:  J M Ramos; J M Vaquero
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.158

7.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; John A King; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A video demonstration of preserved piloting by scent tracking but impaired dead reckoning after fimbria-fornix lesions in the rat.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Boguslaw P Gorny
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.