Literature DB >> 9814912

Energy requirement for eating in cattle.

A Susenbeth1, R Mayer, B Koehler, O Neumann.   

Abstract

We determined the energy requirement for the activity associated with eating in an experiment with four adult Hinterwälder steers weighing 640+/-25 kg BW (mean+/-SD), using indirect calorimetry in respiration chambers. Heat production was measured during 3 h with and 3 h without ad libitum access to wheat straw, and the energy cost of eating was calculated as the difference, which was on average 27+/-13 J/(min x kg BW) (mean+/-SD). Straw intake, the time spent for eating, and the number of jaw movements were recorded. Values for the energy cost of eating reported in the literature are similar to those in this study, and values for ruminating amount to approximately 27% of those for eating. The energy cost of eating (literature values) varies greatly between feeds and feed treatments, when related to the amount of feed ingested, but it was relatively constant when related to time spent eating and was similar for cattle, sheep, and horses, when related to BW or metabolic BW (35 J/[min x kg BW] or 124 J/ [min x kg BW.75]). Calculations indicated that in high-quality roughage 10% of the ME and in untreated straw approximately 30% of the ME provided by the feed are used for eating and ruminating. This might be the main reason for the lower efficiency of ME utilization in roughages. The energy requirement for eating and ruminating should therefore be considered as a distinct proportion of the total ME requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9814912     DOI: 10.2527/1998.76102701x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

Review 1.  Specific dynamic action: a review of the postprandial metabolic response.

Authors:  Stephen M Secor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.

Authors:  Ira L Parsons; Jocelyn R Johnson; William C Kayser; Luis O Tedeschi; Gordon E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The combined effects of supplementing monensin and 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane emissions, growth rate, and feed conversion efficiency in beef cattle fed high-forage and high-grain diets.

Authors:  Diwakar Vyas; Aklilu W Alemu; Sean M McGinn; Stephane M Duval; Maik Kindermann; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Intake and feed utilization in two breeds of pregnant beef cows fed forages with high-fiber concentrations.

Authors:  Mikaela Jardstedt; Anna Hessle; Peder Nørgaard; Linn Frendberg; Elisabet Nadeau
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of physical activity and feed and water restriction at reimplanting time on feed intake patterns, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers.

Authors:  Cory L Helmuth; Dale R Woerner; Michael A Ballou; Jeff L Manahan; Carley M Coppin; Nathan S Long; Ashley A Hoffman; James Daniel Young; Taylor M Smock; Kristin E Hales
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-16

6.  The Effect of Frequency of Fresh Pasture Allocation on the Feeding Behaviour of High Production Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Jessica G Pollock; Alan W Gordon; Kathryn M Huson; Deborah A McConnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.