OBJECTIVE: To determine normal values for 24 h ambulatory blood pressure in a Danish population and to study the relationship to casual blood pressure. STUDY POPULATION: A random sample of 2656 Danish men and women participated in a population survey. The participants were selected in age groups and were aged 41-42, 51-52, 61-62 or 71-72 years during the survey. METHODS; Casual blood pressure (standard mercury sphygmomanometer) and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (Takeda TM-2421) were measured successfully in 2082 subjects. All subjects under antihypertensive treatment (247) were excluded, restricting the study population to 1835 participants. RESULTS: Casual and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure were correlated (P < 0.0001) in all age and sex groups. Casual systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 129.6+/-17.8/82.6+/-10.3 for men and 125.1+/-18.2/79.7+/-9.9 mmHg for women. Twenty-four-hour average blood pressures were 130.8+/-14.2/75.3+/-8.6 for men and 122.4+/-14.9/69.6+/-8.3 mmHg for women. A multivariate linear logistic regression model confirmed that a high casual blood pressure (odds ratios 11/7 for systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P=0.001) was the major determinant of a lower ambulatory than casual blood pressure; age and sex were less important. CONCLUSION: The relationship between casual blood pressure on the one hand and the difference in casual and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure on the other hand suggests that ambulatory blood pressure represents a regression towards the mean compared to casual blood pressure. Any definition of an upper normal level of 24 h ambulatory blood pressure that is derived from a correlation between casual and ambulatory measurements will be inaccurate, and must await long-term studies of the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure and subsequent cardiovascular events.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine normal values for 24 h ambulatory blood pressure in a Danish population and to study the relationship to casual blood pressure. STUDY POPULATION: A random sample of 2656 Danish men and women participated in a population survey. The participants were selected in age groups and were aged 41-42, 51-52, 61-62 or 71-72 years during the survey. METHODS; Casual blood pressure (standard mercury sphygmomanometer) and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (Takeda TM-2421) were measured successfully in 2082 subjects. All subjects under antihypertensive treatment (247) were excluded, restricting the study population to 1835 participants. RESULTS: Casual and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure were correlated (P < 0.0001) in all age and sex groups. Casual systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 129.6+/-17.8/82.6+/-10.3 for men and 125.1+/-18.2/79.7+/-9.9 mmHg for women. Twenty-four-hour average blood pressures were 130.8+/-14.2/75.3+/-8.6 for men and 122.4+/-14.9/69.6+/-8.3 mmHg for women. A multivariate linear logistic regression model confirmed that a high casual blood pressure (odds ratios 11/7 for systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P=0.001) was the major determinant of a lower ambulatory than casual blood pressure; age and sex were less important. CONCLUSION: The relationship between casual blood pressure on the one hand and the difference in casual and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure on the other hand suggests that ambulatory blood pressure represents a regression towards the mean compared to casual blood pressure. Any definition of an upper normal level of 24 h ambulatory blood pressure that is derived from a correlation between casual and ambulatory measurements will be inaccurate, and must await long-term studies of the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure and subsequent cardiovascular events.
Authors: L Frederiksen; K Brødbaek; M Fenger; S Madsbad; S A Urhammer; T Jørgensen; K Borch-Johnsen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2003-05-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Joseph E Schwartz; Matthew M Burg; Daichi Shimbo; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone; Joji Ishikawa; Richard Sloan; Tyla Yurgel; Steven Grossman; Thomas G Pickering Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joji Ishikawa; Yukiko Ishikawa; Donald Edmondson; Thomas G Pickering; Joseph E Schwartz Journal: Blood Press Monit Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Geoffrey A Head; Anastasia S Mihailidou; Karen A Duggan; Lawrence J Beilin; Narelle Berry; Mark A Brown; Alex J Bune; Diane Cowley; John P Chalmers; Peter R C Howe; Jonathan Hodgson; John Ludbrook; Arduino A Mangoni; Barry P McGrath; Mark R Nelson; James E Sharman; Michael Stowasser Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-04-14
Authors: Y Claire Wang; Alisa M Koval; Miyabi Nakamura; Jonathan D Newman; Joseph E Schwartz; Patricia W Stone Journal: Blood Press Monit Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 1.444