Literature DB >> 23263535

Cost-effectiveness of secondary screening modalities for hypertension.

Y Claire Wang1, Alisa M Koval, Miyabi Nakamura, Jonathan D Newman, Joseph E Schwartz, Patricia W Stone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinic-based blood pressure (CBP) has been the default approach for the diagnosis of hypertension, but patients may be misclassified because of masked hypertension (false negative) or 'white coat' hypertension (false positive). The incorporation of other diagnostic modalities, such as home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), holds promise to improve diagnostic accuracy and subsequent treatment decisions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the costs and cost-effectiveness of adding HBPM and ABPM to routine blood pressure screening in adults. We excluded letters, editorials, and studies of pregnant and/or pre-eclamptic patients, children, and patients with specific conditions (e.g. diabetes).
RESULTS: We identified 14 original, English language studies that included cost outcomes and compared two or more modalities. ABPM was found to be cost saving for diagnostic confirmation following an elevated CBP in six studies. Three of four studies found that adding HBPM to an elevated CBP was also cost-effective.
CONCLUSION: Existing evidence supports the cost-effectiveness of incorporating HBPM or ABPM after an initial CBP-based diagnosis of hypertension. Future research should focus on their implementation in clinical practice, long-term economic values, and potential roles in identifying masked hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23263535      PMCID: PMC3960995          DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32835d0fd3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  41 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure : current evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  P Verdecchia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Masked hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Karina Davidson; William Gerin; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension.

Authors:  Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Peter W de Leeuw; Daniel A Duprez; Robert H Fagard; Peter J Gheeraert; Luc H Missault; Jacob J Braun; Roland O Six; Patricia Van Der Niepen; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Screening for high blood pressure: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey Sheridan; Michael Pignone; Katrina Donahue
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring cost-effective in the routine surveillance of treated hypertensive patients in primary care?

Authors:  Paula Lorgelly; Ilias Siatis; Andrew Brooks; Barbara Slinn; Michael W Millar-Craig; Richard Donnelly; Gillian Manning
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Japanese society of hypertension (JSH) guidelines for self-monitoring of blood pressure at home.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai; Kuniaki Otsuka; Yuhei Kawano; Kazuyuki Shimada; Hiroshi Hayashi; Osamu Tochikubo; Masaaki Miyakawa; Koshiro Fukiyama
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Cost analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in initiating antihypertensive drug treatment in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Ben Ewald; Brita Pekarsky
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Elly Den Hond; Hilde Celis; Robert Fagard; Louis Keary; Guy Vandenhoven; Eoin T O'Brien
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cost-effectiveness of options for the diagnosis of high blood pressure in primary care: a modelling study.

Authors:  Kate Lovibond; Sue Jowett; Pelham Barton; Mark Caulfield; Carl Heneghan; F D Richard Hobbs; James Hodgkinson; Jonathan Mant; Una Martin; Bryan Williams; David Wonderling; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to guide hypertensive therapy.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Eugenia Gianos; Arthur Schwartzbard; Henry Black; Howard Weintraub
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-12

2.  Prevalence of Masked Hypertension Among US Adults With Nonelevated Clinic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Y Claire Wang; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner; Andrew E Moran; Lawrence R Krakoff; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Rates, amounts, and determinants of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring claim reimbursements among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shia T Kent; Daichi Shimbo; Lei Huang; Keith M Diaz; Anthony J Viera; Meredith Kilgore; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-10-02

Review 4.  Anti-hypertensive treatment in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: current management and therapeutic features.

Authors:  Alberto Mazza; Michela Armigliato; Maria Cristina Marzola; Laura Schiavon; Domenico Montemurro; Giorgio Vescovo; Marco Zuin; Sotirios Chondrogiannis; Roberta Ravenni; Giuseppe Opocher; Patrick M Colletti; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  J Rick Turner; Anthony J Viera; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Diagnosing hypertension: Evidence supporting the 2015 recommendations of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program.

Authors:  Mark Gelfer; Martin Dawes; Janusz Kaczorowski; Raj Padwal; Lyne Cloutier
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Revisions of Medicare reimbursement policy for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the role of qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Garrett I Ash
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Blood Pressure Measurement Modalities: A Primer for Busy Practitioners.

Authors:  L Allen Kindman; J Rick Turner; John Lee
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in daily practice.

Authors:  Abdulhalim Jamal Kinsara
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-10-05

10.  Design and study protocol for a cluster randomized trial of a multi-faceted implementation strategy to increase the uptake of the USPSTF hypertension screening recommendations: the EMBRACE study.

Authors:  Nathalie Moise; Erica Phillips; Eileen Carter; Carmela Alcantara; Jacob Julian; Anusorn Thanataveerat; Joseph E Schwartz; Siqin Ye; Andrea Duran; Daichi Shimbo; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.