Literature DB >> 29417371

A randomized general population study of the effects of repeated health checks on incident diabetes.

Tea Skaaby1, Torben Jørgensen2,3,4, Allan Linneberg2,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether offering health checks to the general population can be used to prevent diabetes. Few randomized studies have had a long-term follow-up. We used a randomly selected population cohort as a randomized trial to examine the effect of repeated health checks on the 30-year incidence of diabetes.
METHODS: The study included all persons from 11 municipalities in Copenhagen aged 30, 40, 50, and 60 years (n = 17845). An age-stratified and gender-stratified random sample (N = 4789) was invited to participate in a maximum of three health checks between 1982 and 1994 ('intervention group'). The remaining 12994 persons were defined as the 'control group'. The health checks included a questionnaire, a physical examination including assessment of overweight and blood pressure, and blood sampling with determination of serum lipid levels. Based on the person's answers and test results, the participants were given individual information about the results, disease risk and lifestyle. Their general practitioner, too, was provided with written information on the test results. Both groups were followed in the Danish Civil Registration System, the Danish National Diabetes Register, the Cause of Death Registry, and the National Patient Registry until 31 December 2012.
FINDINGS: There were 2636 incident cases of diabetes and a mean follow-up time of 24.1 years. The age-adjusted and gender-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI) for the intervention group versus the control group was HR = 1.07 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.16, p = 0.153).
INTERPRETATION: Offering repeated general health checks to the general population had no preventive effect on the development of diabetes during 30 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; General population; Mass screening; Physical examination; Preventive medicine; Randomized

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29417371     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-018-1542-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  23 in total

Review 1.  The cohorts at the Research Centre for Prevention and Health, formerly 'The Glostrup Population Studies'.

Authors:  Merete Osler; Allan Linneberg; Charlotte Glümer; Torben Jørgensen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  The effect of giving global coronary risk information to adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Anthony J Viera; Mori J Krantz; Christa L Ice; Lesley E Steinman; Karen E Peters; Laurie A Kopin; Danielle Lungelow
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-08

3.  Ten year trends in the dietary habits of Danish men and women. Cohort and cross-sectional data.

Authors:  M Osler; B L Heitmann; M Schroll
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  The Danish Civil Registration System.

Authors:  Carsten Bøcker Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Improved lifestyle and decreased diabetes risk over 13 years: long-term follow-up of the randomised Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS).

Authors:  J Lindström; M Peltonen; J G Eriksson; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Aunola; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Uusitupa; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in a hypertensive population.

Authors:  J Tingleff; M Munch; T J Jakobsen; C Torp-Pedersen; M E Olsen; K H Jensen; T Jørgensen; M Kirchoff
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Casual blood pressure in a general Danish population. Relation to age, sex, weight, height, diabetes, serum lipids and consumption of coffee, tobacco and alcohol.

Authors:  M Kirchhoff; C Torp-Pedersen; K Hougaard; T J Jacobsen; A Sjøl; M Munch; J Tingleff; T Jørgensen; M Schroll; M E Olsen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Effect of general health screening and lifestyle counselling on incidence of diabetes in general population: Inter99 randomised trial.

Authors:  Cathrine J Lau; Charlotta Pisinger; Lise Lotte N Husemoen; Rikke Kart Jacobsen; Allan Linneberg; Torben Jørgensen; Charlotte Glümer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Incidence of gallstones in a Danish population.

Authors:  K H Jensen; T Jørgensen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  The role of patient education in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: an overview.

Authors:  Adriana Coppola; Loredana Sasso; Annamaria Bagnasco; Andrea Giustina; Carmine Gazzaruso
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.633

View more
  1 in total

1.  Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nasheeta Peer; Yusentha Balakrishna; Solange Durao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.