Literature DB >> 9814517

Inverse planning with constraints to generate smoothed intensity-modulated beams.

S Webb1, D J Convery, P M Evans.   

Abstract

Highly conformal dose distributions can be generated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Intensity-modulated beams (IMBs) are generally determined by inverse-planning techniques designed to maximize conformality. Usually such techniques apply no constraints on the form of the IMBs which may then develop fine-scale modulation. In this paper we present a technique for generating smoother IMBs, which yields a dose distribution almost identical to that without the constraint on the form of the IMBs. The method applies various filters successively at intervals throughout the iterative inverse planning. It is shown that the IMBs so determined using a simple median window filter have desirable properties in terms of increasing the efficiency of delivery by the dynamic multileaf collimator method and may be 'more like conventional beams' than unconstrained, highly modulated IMBs.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9814517     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Improving IMRT delivery efficiency with reweighted L1-minimization for inverse planning.

Authors:  Hojin Kim; Stephen Becker; Rena Lee; Soonhyouk Lee; Sukyoung Shin; Emmanuel Candès; Lei Xing; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Search for IMRT inverse plans with piecewise constant fluence maps using compressed sensing techniques.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Adaptive diffusion smoothing: a diffusion-based method to reduce IMRT field complexity.

Authors:  Martha M Matuszak; Edward W Larsen; Kyung-Wook Jee; Daniel L McShan; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yu An; Martin Bues; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Three-dimensional conformal planning with low-segment multicriteria intensity modulated radiation therapy optimization.

Authors:  Fazal Khan; David Craft
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-21

6.  Effect of fluence smoothing on the quality of intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans.

Authors:  Puzhakkal Niyas; Kallikuzhiyil Kochunny Abdullah; Manthala Padannayil Noufal; Thekkedath Sankaran Nair
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-03-07

7.  Evaluation of fluence-smoothing feature for three IMRT planning systems.

Authors:  Christopher J Anker; Brian Wang; Matt Tobler; Julie Chapek; Dennis C Shrieve; Ying J Hitchcock; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT.

Authors:  Shigeru Yokoyama; Peter L Roberson; Dale W Litzenberg; Jean M Moran; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Evaluation and Validation of IBA I'MatriXX Array for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of TomoTherapy®.

Authors:  N V N Madhusudhana Sresty; A Krishnam Raju; B Nagarjuna Reddy; V C Sahithya; Yakub Mohmd; G Deleep Kumar; T Anil Kumar; Tasneem Rushdi; S Aparna; G Durga Prasad; Harjot Kaur Bajwa
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.