Literature DB >> 9813805

Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: a clinical and histologic study.

Y Akagawa1, R Hosokawa, Y Sato, K Kamayama.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Partially stabilized zirconia implants placed by a 1-stage procedure have been previously shown to obtain initial osseointegration under clinically unloaded condition. However, it is unknown whether freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants can maintain a long-term direct bone-implant interface.
PURPOSE: This study examined the possibility of the long-term stability of osseointegration around partially stabilized zirconia implants with a 1-stage procedure with different loading designs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two partially stabilized zirconia implants were placed into the mandibles of 8 monkeys. Three months after implant placement, 3 types of superstructure were provided in each animal to obtain different concepts of support as (1) single freestanding implant support, (2) connected freestanding implant support, and (3) a combination of implant and tooth support. At 12 and 24 months after loading, clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations of peri-implant tissues were performed on 28 implants.
RESULTS: No clear difference in clinical features was observed among the different types of support. Direct bone apposition to the implant was generally seen in all groups. Histometrically, bone contact ratio ranged between 66% and 81%, and bone area ratio varied between 49% and 78% at 24 months after loading. These values showed almost no difference among single freestanding, connected freestanding, and implant-tooth supports of partially stabilized zirconia implants.
CONCLUSION: In a primate model, partially stabilized zirconia implants placed with a 1-stage procedure achieve long-term stability of osseointegration with the use of single freestanding, connected freestanding, and implant-tooth supports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9813805     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70031-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  26 in total

Review 1.  Nanoparticles used in dentistry: A review.

Authors:  Subhashree Priyadarsini; Sumit Mukherjee; Monalisa Mishra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-12-07

2.  Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns.

Authors:  J F Esquivel-Upshaw; M J Kim; S M Hsu; N Abdulhameed; R Jenkins; D Neal; F Ren; A E Clark
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Bone tissue response to experimental zirconia implants.

Authors:  Ilja Mihatovic; Vladimir Golubovic; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Zirconium oxide regulates RNA interfering of osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Annalisa Palmieri; Furio Pezzetti; Giorgio Brunelli; Ilaria Zollino; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Marcella Martinelli; Luca Scapoli; Marzia Arlotti; Elena Masiero; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Response of osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia to bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Han; Kyoung-Hwa Kim; Jung-Seok Han; Ki-Tae Koo; Tae-Il Kim; Yang-Jo Seol; Yong-Moo Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Rita Depprich; Holger Zipprich; Michelle Ommerborn; Christian Naujoks; Hans-Peter Wiesmann; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler; Jörg Handschel
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 7.  Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Marcel F Kunrath; Saurabh Gupta; Felice Lorusso; Antonio Scarano; Sammy Noumbissi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Multiple teeth replacement with endosseous one-piece yttrium-stabilized zirconia dental implants.

Authors:  Andrea-Enrico Borgonovo; Alberto Fabbri; Virna Vavassori; Rachele Censi; Carlo Maiorana
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-11-01

9.  Effects of the sintering conditions of dental zirconia ceramics on the grain size and translucency.

Authors:  Mi-Jin Kim; Jin-Soo Ahn; Ji-Hwan Kim; Hae-Young Kim; Woong-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Behavior of osteoblastic cells cultured on titanium and structured zirconia surfaces.

Authors:  Rita Depprich; Michelle Ommerborn; Holger Zipprich; Christian Naujoks; Jörg Handschel; Hans-Peter Wiesmann; Norbert R Kübler; Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.