Literature DB >> 9813045

Mutational analysis of the Mu transposase. Contributions of two distinct regions of domain II to recombination.

E Krementsova1, M J Giffin, D Pincus, T A Baker.   

Abstract

Mu transposase is a member of a protein family that includes many transposases and the retroviral integrases. These recombinases catalyze the DNA cleavage and joining reactions essential for transpositional recombination. Here we demonstrate that, consistent with structural predictions, aspartate 336 of Mu transposase is required for catalysis of both DNA cleavage and DNA joining. This residue, although located 55 rather than 35 residues NH2-terminal of the essential glutamate, is undoubtedly the analog of the second aspartate of the Asp-Asp-35-Glu motif found in other family members. The core domain of Mu transposase consists of two subdomains: the NH2-terminal subdomain (IIA) contains the conserved Asp-Asp-Glu motif residues, whereas the smaller COOH-terminal subdomain (IIB) contains a large positively charged region exposed on its surface. To probe the function of domain IIB, we constructed mutant proteins carrying deletion or substitution mutations within this region. The activity of the deletion proteins revealed that domains IIA and IIB can be provided by different subunits in the transposase tetramer. Substitution mutations at two pairs of exposed lysine residues within the positively charged surface of domain IIB render transposase defective in transposition at a reaction step after DNA cleavage but prior to DNA joining. The severity of this defect depends on the structure of the DNA flanking the cleavage site. Thus, these data suggest that domain IIB is involved in manipulating the DNA near the cleavage site and that this function is important during the transition between the DNA cleavage and the DNA joining steps of recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9813045     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.31358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  9 in total

1.  Domain III function of Mu transposase analysed by directed placement of subunits within the transpososome.

Authors:  S Mariconda; S Y Namgoong; K H Yoon; H Jiang; R M Harshey
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Mutational analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 identifies three catalytic amino acids in RAG1 critical for both cleavage steps of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  M A Landree; J A Wibbenmeyer; D B Roth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  The terminal nucleotide of the Mu genome controls catalysis of DNA strand transfer.

Authors:  Ilana Goldhaber-Gordon; Michael H Early; Tania A Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition.

Authors:  Joy F Yuan; Daniel R Beniac; George Chaconas; F Peter Ottensmeyer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Application of the bacteriophage Mu-driven system for the integration/amplification of target genes in the chromosomes of engineered Gram-negative bacteria--mini review.

Authors:  Valerii Z Akhverdyan; Evgueni R Gak; Irina L Tokmakova; Nataliya V Stoynova; Yurgis A V Yomantas; Sergey V Mashko
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Flexibility in MuA transposase family protein structures: functional mapping with scanning mutagenesis and sequence alignment of protein homologues.

Authors:  Tiina S Rasila; Mauno Vihinen; Lars Paulin; Saija Haapa-Paananen; Harri Savilahti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mu transpososome activity-profiling yields hyperactive MuA variants for highly efficient genetic and genome engineering.

Authors:  Tiina S Rasila; Elsi Pulkkinen; Saija Kiljunen; Saija Haapa-Paananen; Maria I Pajunen; Anu Salminen; Lars Paulin; Mauno Vihinen; Phoebe A Rice; Harri Savilahti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution.

Authors:  Sherwin P Montaño; Ying Z Pigli; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.