Literature DB >> 9807584

Trochanteric hip fracture: strong association with spinal trabecular bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT.

T F Lang1, P Augat, N E Lane, H K Genant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the discriminatory capability for hip fracture of trabecular and integral bone mineral density (BMD) measured with quantitative computed tomography (CT) of the spine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six women who had sustained hip fractures and 59 control subjects underwent volumetric quantitative CT of L1 and L2 and dual x-ray absorptiometry of the hip. BMD was measured in vertebral regions of interest that encompassed trabecular, cortical, and integral bone. Logistic regression analysis was applied to each BMD measure to derive age-, weight-, and height-adjusted relative risk (RR) factors for overall hip fracture and for trochanteric fracture and cervical fracture separately.
RESULTS: Spinal trabecular BMD was modestly related to overall hip fracture (RR, 1.4-1.7; P < .05) and strongly associated with trochanteric fracture (RR, 4.2-4.5; P < .005). Spinal integral BMD related similarly to overall hip fracture (RR, 1.7-1.8; P < .05) but more weakly to trochanteric fracture (RR, 2.3-3.2; P < .01). No spinal BMD measures were significantly related to cervical fracture. BMD at the hip was strongly related to overall hip fracture (RR, 3.3-4.3; P < .001), cervical fracture (RR, 2.7-5.3; P < .001), and trochanteric fracture (RR, 2.9-7.2; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Spinal trabecular BMD is strongly associated with both trochanteric and vertebral fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807584     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of technical and biological parameters of volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the foot: a phantom study.

Authors:  K E Smith; B R Whiting; G G Reiker; P K Commean; D R Sinacore; F W Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Differences in hip quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements of bone mineral density and bone strength between glucocorticoid-treated and glucocorticoid-naive postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kuo-Chiang Lian; Thomas F Lang; Joyce H Keyak; Gunnard W Modin; Qaisar Rehman; Loi Do; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Association of 3D Geometric Measures Derived From Quantitative Computed Tomography With Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men.

Authors:  Jan Borggrefe; Timm de Buhr; Smriti Shrestha; Lynn M Marshall; Eric Orwoll; Kathy Peters; Dennis M Black; Claus C Glüer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Experimental study exploring the factors that promote rib fragility in the elderly.

Authors:  Christian Liebsch; Shamila Hübner; Marco Palanca; Luca Cristofolini; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Similarities and differences between sexes in regional loss of cortical and trabecular bone in the mid-femoral neck: the AGES-Reykjavik longitudinal study.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Thor Aspelund; Jonathan Reeve; Kenneth E Poole; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur G Gudnason; Gunnar Sigurdsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.741

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.