Literature DB >> 22147208

Assessment of technical and biological parameters of volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the foot: a phantom study.

K E Smith1, B R Whiting, G G Reiker, P K Commean, D R Sinacore, F W Prior.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Few studies exist for bone densitometry of the whole foot. A phantom study demonstrated the sources of error and necessary controls for accurate quantitative computed tomography of the foot. A loss in bone mineral density (BMD) in the small foot bones may be an early indicator of diabetic foot complications.
INTRODUCTION: Volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT) facilitates the assessment of pedal bone osteopenia, which, in the presence of peripheral neuropathy, may well be an early sign of diabetic foot deformity. To date, sources and magnitudes of error in foot vQCT measurements have not been reported.
METHODS: Foot phantoms were scanned using a 64-slice CT scanner. Energy (in kilovoltage peak), table height, phantom size and orientation, location of "bone" inserts, insert material, location of calibration phantom, and reconstruction kernel were systematically varied during scan acquisition.
RESULTS: Energy (in kilovoltage peak) and distance from the isocenter (table height) resulted in relative attenuation changes from -5% to 22% and -5% to 0%, respectively, and average BMD changes from -0.9% to 0.0% and -1.1% to 0.3%, respectively, compared to a baseline 120-kVp scan performed at the isocenter. BMD compared to manufacturer-specified values ranged, on average, from -2.2% to 0.9%. Phantom size and location of bone-equivalent material inserts resulted in relative attenuation changes of -1.2% to 1.4% compared to the medium-sized phantom.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that variations in kilovoltage peak and table height can be controlled using a calibration phantom scanned at the same energy and height as a foot phantom; however, error due to soft tissue thickness and location of bones within a foot cannot be controlled using a calibration phantom alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22147208      PMCID: PMC3339281          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1851-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  24 in total

Review 1.  Nonoperative treatment of neuro-osteoarthropathy of the foot: do we need new criteria?

Authors:  Ernst Chantelau; Renate Kimmerle; Ludger W Poll
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.231

Review 2.  Bone mass and architecture determination: state of the art.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.690

3.  Helical multidetector row quantitative computed tomography (QCT) precision.

Authors:  Michael Bligh; Luc Bidaut; R Allen White; William A Murphy; Donna M Stevens; Dianna D Cody
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Effect of CT acquisition parameters in the detection of subtle hypoattenuation in acute cerebral infarction: a phantom study.

Authors:  C Tanaka; T Ueguchi; E Shimosegawa; N Sasaki; T Johkoh; H Nakamura; J Hatazawa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans.

Authors:  Debdut Biswas; Jesse E Bible; Michael Bohan; Andrew K Simpson; Peter G Whang; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Judith E Adams; Gabriele Armbrecht; Peter Augat; Cesar E Bogado; Mary L Bouxsein; Dieter Felsenberg; Masako Ito; Sven Prevrhal; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Inflammatory osteolysis in diabetic neuropathic (charcot) arthropathies of the foot.

Authors:  David R Sinacore; Mary K Hastings; Kathryn L Bohnert; Faye A Fielder; Dennis T Villareal; Vilray P Blair; Jeffrey E Johnson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-09-18

8.  Accurate quantification of width and density of bone structures by computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas N Hangartner; David F Short
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Lower-extremity amputation risk after charcot arthropathy and diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  Min-Woong Sohn; Rodney M Stuck; Michael Pinzur; Todd A Lee; Elly Budiman-Mak
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Candidate Imaging Marker for Early Detection of Charcot Neuroarthropathy.

Authors:  Paul K Commean; Kirk E Smith; Charles F Hildebolt; Kathryn L Bohnert; David R Sinacore; Fred W Prior
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Automated, foot-bone registration using subdivision-embedded atlases for spatial mapping of bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Paul K Commean; Charles Hildebolt; Dave Sinacore; Fred Prior; James P Carson; Ioannis Kakadiaris; Tao Ju
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Pedal bone density, strength, orientation, and plantar loads preceding incipient metatarsal fracture after charcot neuroarthropathy: 2 case reports.

Authors:  David J Gutekunst; David R Sinacore
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Persistent inflammation with pedal osteolysis 1year after Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy.

Authors:  David R Sinacore; Kathryn L Bohnert; Kirk E Smith; Mary K Hastings; Paul K Commean; David J Gutekunst; Jeffrey E Johnson; Fred W Prior
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.852

5.  A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners.

Authors:  Yali Li; Yaojun Jiang; Huilong Liu; Xi Yu; Sihui Chen; Duoshan Ma; Jianbo Gao; Yan Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

6.  Predicting ex vivo failure loads in human metatarsals using bone strength indices derived from volumetric quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  David J Gutekunst; Tarpit K Patel; Kirk E Smith; Paul K Commean; Matthew J Silva; David R Sinacore
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Impact of Charcot neuroarthropathy on metatarsal bone mineral density and geometric strength indices.

Authors:  David J Gutekunst; Kirk E Smith; Paul K Commean; Kathryn L Bohnert; Fred W Prior; David R Sinacore
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Brett Allaire; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Computed tomography derived bone density measurement in the diabetic foot.

Authors:  Alex Barwick; John Tessier; James Mirow; Xanne Janse de Jonge; Vivienne Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.303

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.