Literature DB >> 980674

The magic number 4 +/- 0: a new look at visual numerosity judgements.

J Atkinson, F W Campbell, M R Francis.   

Abstract

Visual numerosity judgements were made for tachistoscopically presented linear arrays of dots or lines. The interelement interval (which could be specified in spatial frequency terms) was constant for a given array but varied across conditions. A clear limit in the accuracy of numerosity judgements was found to be set at 4 for regularly spaced elements with spatial frequencies below approximately 10 cycles/deg (element and interelement interval of 0-05 deg). This limit in terms of accuracy is accompanied by a fast and almost constant response time for arrays of 4 or less, compared to response times for arrays of more than 4 elements. The limit in accuracy falls to 2 elements rather than 4 for spacing narrower than 0-05 deg alghough with such spacing the elements are still easily resolved. The limit of 4 is found if the stimulus is a bright afterimage, lasting for approximately 60 s. This result suggests that the limit is independent of the time allowed for a single fixation and is a perceptual limit rather than a limit in some memory buffer. 'Numerosity' units are propsoed to account for the results.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 980674     DOI: 10.1068/p050327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  36 in total

1.  Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views.

Authors:  David H Foster; Stuart J Gilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Manuela Piazza; Eric Giacomini; Denis Le Bihan; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-12-15

4.  Is subitizing a unique numerical ability?

Authors:  J D Balakrishnan; F G Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-12

5.  Size invariance in visual number discrimination.

Authors:  J Allik; T Tuulmets; P G Vos
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

6.  Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages.

Authors:  T J Simon; S Vaishnavi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

7.  The effect of line configuration on perceived numerosity of dotted lines.

Authors:  A Krishna; P Raghubir
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

8.  Processing scalar implicature: a constraint-based approach.

Authors:  Judith Degen; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-09-30

9.  The social brain: scale-invariant layering of Erdős-Rényi networks in small-scale human societies.

Authors:  Michael S Harré; Mikhail Prokopenko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Ontogeny of numerical abilities in fish.

Authors:  Angelo Bisazza; Laura Piffer; Giovanna Serena; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.