| Literature DB >> 27194482 |
Michael S Harré1, Mikhail Prokopenko2.
Abstract
The cognitive ability to form social links that can bind individuals together into large cooperative groups for safety and resource sharing was a key development in human evolutionary and social history. The 'social brain hypothesis' argues that the size of these social groups is based on a neurologically constrained capacity for maintaining long-term stable relationships. No model to date has been able to combine a specific socio-cognitive mechanism with the discrete scale invariance observed in ethnographic studies. We show that these properties result in nested layers of self-organizing Erdős-Rényi networks formed by each individual's ability to maintain only a small number of social links. Each set of links plays a specific role in the formation of different social groups. The scale invariance in our model is distinct from previous 'scale-free networks' studied using much larger social groups; here, the scale invariance is in the relationship between group sizes, rather than in the link degree distribution. We also compare our model with a dominance-based hierarchy and conclude that humans were probably egalitarian in hunter-gatherer-like societies, maintaining an average maximum of four or five social links connecting all members in a largest social network of around 132 people.Entities:
Keywords: Erdős–Rényi networks; discrete scale invariance; social brain hypothesis; social networks
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27194482 PMCID: PMC4892260 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J R Soc Interface ISSN: 1742-5662 Impact factor: 4.118