Literature DB >> 9804224

One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery.

L Mettler1, M Ibrahim, W Jonat.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was a comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. Utilizing robotic technology a robot has been designed specifically for the purpose of holding and manoeuvring the laparoscope under the direct control of the surgeon. We tested AESOP (automated endoscopic system for optimal positioning) in 50 patients undergoing routine gynaecological endoscopic surgical procedures. The elimination of the camera holder allows two doctors to perform complex laparoscopic surgery faster than without the robotic arm. The timing of surgical procedures performed by surgeons using the voice control was compared to the timing of similar operations using the foot or hand control. The voice-controlled AESOP works more efficiently and faster than the hand or foot control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9804224     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  [Workflow analysis to assess the efficiency of intraoperative technology using the example of functional endoscopic sinus surgery].

Authors:  G Strauss; M Fischer; J Meixensberger; V Falk; C Trantakis; D Winkler; F Bootz; O Burgert; A Dietz; H U Lemke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Hongqian Liu; DongHao Lu; Gang Shi; Huan Song; Lei Wang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Gang Shi; DongHao Lu; Zhihong Liu; Dan Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

Review 4.  History of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Satyam Kalan; Sanket Chauhan; Rafael F Coelho; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio R Camacho; Kenneth J Palmer; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-22

5.  Robot-assisted gynecological surgery in a community setting.

Authors:  Johann M Piquion-Joseph; Anju Nayar; Armine Ghazaryan; Ramesha Papanna; Waldemar Klimek; Rahul Laroia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-03-07

6.  A Compact Modular Teleoperated Robotic System for Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Peter Berkelman; Ji Ma
Journal:  Int J Rob Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.703

7.  Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Hongqian Liu; DongHao Lu; Therese Dowswell; Huan Song; Lei Wang; Gang Shi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-15

8.  The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?

Authors:  B M Kraft; C Jäger; K Kraft; B J Leibl; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot.

Authors:  C Diaz-Arrastia; C Jurnalov; G Gomez; C Townsend
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY.

Authors:  Manish Maheshwari; Thomas Ind
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.