Literature DB >> 27638215

Robot-assisted gynecological surgery in a community setting.

Johann M Piquion-Joseph1, Anju Nayar2, Armine Ghazaryan2, Ramesha Papanna2, Waldemar Klimek2, Rahul Laroia2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to review our experience using the da Vinci robotic system to perform various gynecological surgeries for benign indications. Between July 2005 and April 2008, 110 patients underwent robot-assisted gynecological surgeries in Rochester General Hospital, NY. The records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed by an independent data collector to analyze the safety, effectiveness, and outcome of the surgeries done using the robotic system. The parameters reviewed include indication for surgery, type of procedure, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and intraoperative and post operative complications. The procedures completed include 74 hysterectomies including hysterectomies with bilateral salpingoophorectomy, 15 hysterectomies with sacrocolpopexy and other concomitant procedures, 18 myomectomies, and 3 oophorectomies. All procedures were completed robotically without the need for conversion to an open approach. The mean operation time was 2.15 h. Average estimated blood loss was 160 cc. Complications encountered include one cystotomy which was identified immediately and repaired in addition to one vault dehiscence and two post operative infections. The mean hospital stay was 1 day, with more than half of the patients being discharged within 24 h after the surgery. Post operative pain level was in the range of 0-6 in a scale of 0-10 (0: no pain, 10: worst pain in their life) and relieved by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Robot-assisted laparoscopic benign surgical procedures are feasible techniques in a community setting. Robot-assisted laparoscopy has a promising future in minimally invasive surgery as it proved beneficial for our patients who experienced low complication rate and overall fast recovery compared to other approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Myomectomy; Robot-assisted surgery; Sacrocolpopexy; da Vinci

Year:  2009        PMID: 27638215     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-009-0130-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  13 in total

1.  Comparison between personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Leminen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Classification committee of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

Authors:  D L Olive; W H Parker; J M Cooper; R L Levine
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2000-02

3.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal surgery.

Authors:  H Margossian; T Falcone
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland.

Authors:  Thomas A Vögeli; Martin Burchardt; Paolo Fornara; Jens Rassweiler; Tullio Sulser
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study.

Authors:  M Degueldre; J Vandromme; P T Huong; G B Cadière
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997.

Authors:  Cynthia M Farquhar; Claudia A Steiner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  A Perino; G Cucinella; R Venezia; A Castelli; E Cittadini
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience.

Authors:  R Kevin Reynolds; Arnold P Advincula
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot.

Authors:  C Diaz-Arrastia; C Jurnalov; G Gomez; C Townsend
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; L M Koonin; R Pokras; L T Strauss; Z Xia; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Mona E Orady; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.