Literature DB >> 9803979

Expanding clinical applications of population pharmacodynamic modelling.

C Minto1, T Schnider.   

Abstract

Population pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics is the study of the variability in drug concentration or pharmacological effect between individuals when standard dosage regimens are administered. We provide an overview of pharmacokinetic models, pharmacodynamic models, population models and residual error models. We outline how population modelling approaches seek to explain interpatient variability with covariate analysis, and, in some approaches, to characterize the unexplained interindividual variability. The interpretation of the results of population modelling approaches is facilitated by shifting the emphasis from the perspective of the modeller to the perspective of the clinician. Both the explained and unexplained interpatient variability should be presented in terms of their impact on the dose-response relationship. Clinically relevant questions relating to the explained and unexplained variability in the population can be posed to the model, and confidence intervals can be obtained for the fraction of the population that is estimated to fall within a specific therapeutic range given a certain dosing regimen. Such forecasting can be used to develop optimal initial dosing guidelines. The development of population models (with random effects) permits the application of Bayes's formula to obtain improved estimates of an individual's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in the light of observed responses. An important challenge to clinical pharmacology is to identify the drugs that might benefit from such adaptive-control-with-feedback dosing strategies. Drugs used for life threatening diseases with a proven pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, a small therapeutic range, large interindividual variability, small interoccasion variability and severe adverse effects are likely to be good candidates. Rapidly evolving changes in health care economics and consumer expectations make it unlikely that traditional drug development approaches will succeed in the future. A shift away from the narrow focus on rejecting the null hypothesis towards a broader focus on seeking to understand the factors that influence the dose-response relationship--together with the development of the next generation of software based on population models--should permit a more efficient and rational drug development programme.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9803979      PMCID: PMC1874157          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00792.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  84 in total

1.  Building population pharmacokinetic--pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects.

Authors:  J W Mandema; D Verotta; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

2.  Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm.

Authors:  J P Klein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Time-dependent distribution volume and kinetics of the pharmacodynamic effector site.

Authors:  T K Henthorn; T C Krejcie; C A Shanks; M J Avram
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump.

Authors:  S L Shafer; K M Gregg
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-04

6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of caffeine: tolerance to pressor effects.

Authors:  J Shi; N L Benowitz; C P Denaro; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Computer-controlled infusion of intravenous dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in adult human volunteers.

Authors:  J B Dyck; M Maze; C Haack; D L Azarnoff; L Vuorilehto; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Pharmacoimmunodynamics of methylprednisolone: trafficking of helper T lymphocytes.

Authors:  L E Fisher; E A Ludwig; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-08

9.  Results and validation of a population pharmacodynamic model for cognitive effects in Alzheimer patients treated with tacrine.

Authors:  N H Holford; K E Peace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Survival after AIDS diagnosis in Washington State: trends through 1989 and effect of the case definition change of 1987.

Authors:  C Maden; S G Hopkins; M Smyser; W E Lafferty
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988)       Date:  1993-10
View more
  20 in total

1.  Target concentration intervention: beyond Y2K.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Economic evaluations during early (phase II) drug development: a role for clinical trial simulations?

Authors:  D A Hughes; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  All half-lives are wrong, but some half-lives are useful.

Authors:  J G Wright; A V Boddy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Role of modelling and simulation: a European regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Siv Jönsson; Anja Henningsson; Monica Edholm; Tomas Salmonson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Interpreting population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses - a clinical viewpoint.

Authors:  Stephen B Duffull; Daniel F B Wright; Helen R Winter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Biphasic characteristic of interactions between stiripentol and carbamazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model: a three-dimensional isobolographic analysis.

Authors:  Jarogniew J Luszczki; Stanislaw J Czuczwar
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 7.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Data supplementation: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic knowledge creation approach for characterizing an unexplored region of the response surface.

Authors:  Ene I Ette; Hui-May Chu; Christopher J Godfrey
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of anesthetics.

Authors:  Erik Olofsen; Albert Dahan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Model-based drug development: the road to quantitative pharmacology.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Vikram Sinha; S Thomas Forgue; Sophie Callies; Lan Ni; Richard Peck; Sandra R B Allerheiligen
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.