Literature DB >> 9800404

Nonpalpable, probably benign breast lesions in general practice: the role of follow-up mammography.

L E Duijm1, J O Zaat, G L Guit.   

Abstract

A nonpalpable, probably benign lesion is frequently detected on mammograms. The aim of this paper was to determine the role of follow-up mammography as an alternative to surgical biopsy of these lesions, in patients from a general practice population. In a prospective study we estimated the compliance rate of general practitioners and patients with the recommendations for mammographic follow-up of nonpalpable, probably benign lesions. Reasons for noncompliance, the value of a reminder and the probability of malignancy were determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9800404      PMCID: PMC1313139     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  14 in total

1.  Experience with indeterminate mammograms.

Authors:  P De Neef; J Gandara
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-01

Review 2.  Management of probably benign breast lesions.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment?

Authors:  R M Maes; D J Dronkers; J H Hendriks; M A Thijssen; H W Nab
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Selective nonoperative management of patients referred with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  E J Erickson; J M McGreevy; A Muskett
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography.

Authors:  X Varas; F Leborgne; J H Leborgne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use.

Authors:  S H Taplin; C Anderman; L Grothaus; S Curry; D Montano
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield.

Authors:  M A Helvie; D R Pennes; M Rebner; D D Adler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services.

Authors:  S M Ornstein; D R Garr; R G Jenkins; P F Rust; A Arnon
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer.

Authors:  L E Duijm; G L Guit; J O Zaat; A R Koomen; D Willebrand
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study.

Authors:  L E Duijm; G L Guit; J H Hendriks; J O Zaat; W P Mali
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-28

2.  Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal breast cancer screening mammograms in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeanette C Reece; Eleanor F G Neal; Peter Nguyen; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign.

Authors:  Karen A Lee; Nishi Talati; Rebecca Oudsema; Sharon Steinberger; Laurie R Margolies
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.