Literature DB >> 2024508

Experience with indeterminate mammograms.

P De Neef1, J Gandara.   

Abstract

Most radiologists recommend follow-up mammography in 3 to 6 months for asymptomatic patients with mammographic lesions that do not appear suspicious enough to warrant immediate biopsy. In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of 776 patients were audited 24 to 35 months after mammography to estimate the frequency of indeterminate lesions, the probability of malignancy, and the rate of patients' compliance with recommendations. Almost 2% of patients retested after an indeterminate mammogram were found to have breast cancer (95% confidence limits 0.2% and 5.9%). Only 26% of the patients retested during the audit period had the test within the suggested upper limit of 6 months. We conclude that timely follow-up after an indeterminate mammogram is advisable and that for the population we studied, compliance with this recommendation is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2024508      PMCID: PMC1002672     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  18 in total

1.  Increasing the effort toward breast cancer detection.

Authors:  M D Wertheimer; M E Costanza; T F Dodson; C D'Orsi; H Pastides; J G Zapka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography.

Authors:  I M Freundlich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Evaluating the success of mammography at the local level: how to conduct an audit of your practice.

Authors:  D B Spring; K Kimbrell-Wilmot
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Screening mammography--potential problems on the horizon.

Authors:  F M Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Imaging features and management of characteristically benign and probably benign breast lesions.

Authors:  M J Homer
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Xeroradiography of the breast: overview of 21,057 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J N Wolfe; K A Buck; M Salane; N J Parekh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Growth rates of primary breast cancers.

Authors:  L Heuser; J S Spratt; H C Polk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities: timing the follow-up studies.

Authors:  M J Homer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nonpalpable, probably benign breast lesions in general practice: the role of follow-up mammography.

Authors:  L E Duijm; J O Zaat; G L Guit
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer.

Authors:  L E Duijm; G L Guit; J O Zaat; A R Koomen; D Willebrand
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.