Literature DB >> 1984295

Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield.

M A Helvie1, D R Pennes, M Rebner, D D Adler.   

Abstract

All recommendations for mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions seen at mammography during a 6-month period were reviewed to establish compliance rate and eventual outcome. One hundred forty-four of 2,650 mammograms (5%) showed minimal abnormalities that warranted short-term and periodic mammographic follow-up. Rates of compliance at 4 months and at 1, 2, and 3 years were 88%, 71%, 60%, and 47%, respectively. Progressive mammographic change was found in 10 patients, only one of whom had a carcinoma. It was concluded that mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions is a reasonable alternative to surgical biopsy, although patient compliance remains a significant problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1984295     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Frequency of malignancy seen in probably benign lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: findings from ACRIN 6667.

Authors:  Susan P Weinstein; Lucy G Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell D Schnall; Mark A Rosen; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  [Evaluation of the results after using of the BI-RADS categories in 1,777 clinical mammograms].

Authors:  E A Hauth; K Khan; B Wolfgarten; A Betzler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Anne Marie McCarthy; Susan P Weinstein; Mitchell D Schnall; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Eun Young Chae; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi; Hak Hee Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Nonpalpable, probably benign breast lesions in general practice: the role of follow-up mammography.

Authors:  L E Duijm; J O Zaat; G L Guit
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  The mammographic density of a mass is a significant predictor of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan W Woods; Gale S Sisney; Lonie R Salkowski; Kazuhiko Shinki; Yunzhi Lin; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Validation of results from knowledge discovery: mass density as a predictor of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan W Woods; Louis Oliphant; Kazuhiko Shinki; David Page; Jude Shavlik; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.