Literature DB >> 9797940

The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination.

R J Snowden1, S T Hammett.   

Abstract

Perceived contrast, contrast detection thresholds and contrast discrimination thresholds were measured in the presence and absence of surrounding patterns of a similar spatio-temporal makeup. In the foveal retina we found that the perceived contrast of the central pattern was reduced by the presence of the contrast surrounds with the effect being greatest at low test contrast. Detection thresholds were not affected and contrast discrimination thresholds were only affected over a small range of low test contrasts. However if the test pattern was made smaller, or if its central part was occluded detection thresholds were raised. In the peripheral retina detection thresholds were raised and discrimination thresholds were affected over most of the range of contrasts. We argue that the pattern of results resembles those produced in masking paradigms where the test and mask are coextensive if the spatial range of interactions is taken into account and hence the effects of the contrast surround may be merely a manifestation of normal masking processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797940     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00379-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  41 in total

1.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.

Authors:  C C Chen; C W Tyler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

Authors:  Barbara Zenger-Landolt; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dynamics of unconscious contextual effects in orientation processing.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Authors:  Lynn A Olzak; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Contextual effects on fine orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Stephanie A Saylor; Lynn A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The effect of spatial configuration on surround suppression of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Crowding and surround suppression: not to be confused.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Ariella V Popple; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Responses to second-order texture modulations undergo surround suppression.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; David J Heeger; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Discriminating natural image statistics from neuronal population codes.

Authors:  Satohiro Tajima; Masato Okada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.