Literature DB >> 9796795

Full-body interface pressure testing as a method for performance evaluation of clinical support surfaces.

F Shelton1, R Barnett, E Meyer.   

Abstract

A method for evaluating the performance of clinical support surfaces is required by designers in their efforts to produce better clinical support surfaces that will reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers. In this study, a Pressure Index (P(index)) is defined which is derived from an analytical equation used to evaluate the average interface pressure, the peak pressure, the magnitude of the peak pressure, and the number of peak pressures on the entire body. The type of subjects needed to represent a population of users as well as the head of bed elevations necessary to simulate clinical applications were integrated with the P(index) to create a single-value mean pressure index which can be used to evaluate any type of surface. To determine the accuracy and repeatability of the mean pressure index, three surfaces (a standard hospital innerspring, a replacement foam mattress, and a low-airloss surface) were tested and evaluated using this method. The low airloss performed the best and the standard innerspring clearly performed the worst (p < 0.0001). The method appeared to accurately and reproducibly predict the relative performance of the three surfaces in reducing pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9796795     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00069-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  9 in total

1.  [Interface pressure measurement in the treatment of pressure sores. Comparison with subcutaneous pressure values measured in healthy volunteers].

Authors:  H-U Völker; N Rölker; C Willy
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Effects of Mattress Material on Body Pressure Profiles in Different Sleeping Postures.

Authors:  Fan-Zhe Low; Matthew Chin-Heng Chua; Pan-Yin Lim; Chen-Hua Yeow
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-21

3.  Pressure Mapping Comparison of Four OR Surfaces.

Authors:  Holly Kirkland-Walsh; Oleg Teleten; Machelle Wilson; Bonnie Raingruber
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  Design for Bedridden Elderly: Presenting Pressure Ulcer Product Design Based on Anthropometric Characteristics.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Wanqiang Li; Hong Hu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-30

5.  A novel bamboo sheet chair and its influence on sitting comfort.

Authors:  Fangcheng Yuan; Yong Guo; Yunjiao Shi; Kaiting Zhang; Zhenzhen Zhu; Yuxia Chen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Dermal exposure potential from textiles that contain silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Mathew G Duling; Robert B Lawrence; Treye A Thomas; Ryan F LeBouf; Eleanor E Wade; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

7.  Influence of support on intra-abdominal pressure, hepatic kinetics of indocyanine green and extravascular lung water during prone positioning in patients with ARDS: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Pierre Michelet; Antoine Roch; Marc Gainnier; Jean-Marie Sainty; Jean-Pierre Auffray; Laurent Papazian
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Effects of interface pressure distribution on human sleep quality.

Authors:  Zongyong Chen; Yuqian Li; Rong Liu; Dong Gao; Quanhui Chen; Zhian Hu; Jiajun Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Lateral pressure equalisation as a principle for designing support surfaces to prevent deep tissue pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Colin J Boyle; Diagarajen Carpanen; Thanyani Pandelani; Claire A Higgins; Marc A Masen; Spyros D Masouros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.