Literature DB >> 16252116

[Interface pressure measurement in the treatment of pressure sores. Comparison with subcutaneous pressure values measured in healthy volunteers].

H-U Völker1, N Rölker, C Willy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pressure relief is an important factor to determine the quality of anti-decubitus devices. Many studies have been carried out to measure the interface pressure, but because the results differed markedly, we made a study to assess the measurement devices.
METHODS: The systems FSA, a device for internal use in the Lück company, the X-Sensor and an invasive subcutaneous pressure measurement over the os-sacrum (COACH: piezoelectric probe, MIPM) were tested on 20 healthy volunteers (average age 27 years, average BMI 21.8).
RESULTS: The values of interface measurement showed obvious deviations from subcutaneous pressure in two cases (FSA +1.8%, Lück -33%, X-Sensor +65%) and some results showed extreme variations (FSA +18 mmHg, Lück -21 mmHg, X-Sensor +27 mmHg).
CONCLUSIONS: The interface pressure measurement (with a few volunteers) is not suitable for a correct assessment of anti-decubitus devices. Furthermore, the use of this method is not necessary to monitor pressure relief in intensive care patients. These systems can, however be useful in the training of nursing staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16252116     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-005-0942-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  12 in total

1.  The effect of position and mattress on interface pressure.

Authors:  T Defloor
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  [The effect of soft care mattresses on subcutaneous tissue pressure and pO2 over the os sacrum].

Authors:  H U Völker; G Röper; H Gerngross; C Willy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.

Authors:  S V Rithalia; M Gonsalkorale
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Full-body interface pressure testing as a method for performance evaluation of clinical support surfaces.

Authors:  F Shelton; R Barnett; E Meyer
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  A quantitative analysis of pressure and shear in the effectiveness of support surfaces.

Authors:  R Fontaine; S Risley; R Castellino
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.741

6.  An investigation of interface pressures in low air loss beds.

Authors:  D W Ryan; V Allen; A Murray
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Measurement of support surface efficacy: pressure.

Authors:  R I Barnett; F E Shelton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Using pressure measurements to evaluate different technologies.

Authors:  P M Burman
Journal:  Decubitus       Date:  1993-05

9.  Accuracy of interface pressure measurement systems.

Authors:  V Allen; D W Ryan; N Lomax; A Murray
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-07

Review 10.  Review of interface pressure measurement to establish a protocol for their use in the assessment of patient support surfaces.

Authors:  C J Wolsley; P D Hill
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.932

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.