Literature DB >> 9796226

Recognition of script-typical versus script-atypical information: effects of cognitive elaboration.

E Erdfelder1, J Bredenkamp.   

Abstract

Memory for script-atypical information has been shown to be superior to memory for script-typical information. Two explanations of this typicality effect are evaluated: (1) the attention-elaboration hypothesis (AEH) and (2) the script-copy-plus-tag hypothesis (SCTH). The AEH claims that atypical information is recognized better because it attracts more attention and cognitive elaboration. According to the SCTH, memory representations of script-based texts are established automatically and constitute a copy of the script plus tags for atypical events that facilitate later recognition. We investigated recognition memory and memory for the presentation form of typical and atypical items originally shown with versus without missing letters. Experiment 1 showed that presenting items in fragmentary form tends to improve recognition memory mostly for highly typical items. Experiment 2 revealed that the size of this missing-letters effect is affected by the presentation form of items preceding the target items during acquisition. For fragmented items preceded by other fragmented items, the typicality effect virtually disappeared. Memory for the presentation form of items was generally moderate. These results are readily explained within the AEH framework and pose some problems for the SCTH.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9796226     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Memory structure in the processing of advertising messages: how is unusual information represented?

Authors:  J M Hunt; J B Kernan; E H Bonfield
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1992-07

2.  Aging and memory for expected and unexpected objects in real-world settings.

Authors:  T Mäntylä; L Bäckman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Mobilization of cognitive resources and the generation effect.

Authors:  K Fiedler; H Lachnit; D Fay; C Krug
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-07

4.  The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.

Authors:  D J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.

Authors:  K Murnane; U J Bayen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

6.  Memory for script actions: effects of relevance and detail expectancy.

Authors:  R H Maki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-01

7.  Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.

Authors:  A Friedman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-09

Review 8.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring.

Authors:  R A Kinchla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Effect of schema-incongruent information on memory for stereotypical attributes.

Authors:  C S O'Sullivan; F T Durso
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1984-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring.

Authors:  U J Bayen; G V Nakamura; S E Dupuis; C L Yang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

2.  Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location.

Authors:  J I Caldwell; M E Masson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

3.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

4.  Positive association between OLIG2 and schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Ke Huang; Wei Tang; Ruqi Tang; Zhao Xu; Zhangdong He; Zhiqiang Li; Yifeng Xu; Xingwang Li; Guang He; Guoying Feng; Lin He; Yongyong Shi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Conceptual processing effects on automatic memory.

Authors:  Dawn M McBride; Heather Shoudel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

6.  Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?

Authors:  Marie Luisa Schaper; Ute J Bayen; Carolin V Hey
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2022-08-10

7.  Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: a test of the probability-matching account.

Authors:  Nina R Arnold; Ute J Bayen; Beatrice G Kuhlmann; Bianca Vaterrodt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

8.  Expectancy effects in source memory: how moving to a bad neighborhood can change your memory.

Authors:  Meike Kroneisen; Larissa Woehe; Leonie Sophie Rausch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

9.  Executive Resources and Item-Context Binding: Exploring the Influence of Concurrent Inhibition, Updating, and Shifting Tasks on Context Memory.

Authors:  Marek Nieznański; Michał Obidziński; Emilia Zyskowska; Daria Niedziałkowska
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.