Literature DB >> 9795879

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mizolastine and validation from sparse data on patients using the nonparametric maximum likelihood method.

F Mesnil1, F Mentré, C Dubruc, J P Thénot, A Mallet.   

Abstract

A population analysis of the kinetics of mizolastine was performed from concentrations on 449 allergic patients, using the nonparametric maximum likelihood method (NPML). A two-compartment open model with zero-order absorption was used to describe the kinetics of mizolastine after oral administration. A heteroscedastic variance model was assumed for the error. To explain the kinetic variability, eight covariates were introduced in the analysis: gender, pharmaceutical dosage form, age, body weight, serum creatinine concentration, creatinine renal clearance, plasma levels of hepatic transaminases ASAT and ALAT. Their relationships to the kinetic parameters were studied by means of the estimated distribution of each kinetic parameter conditional on different levels of each covariate. An important interindividual kinetic variability was found for all parameters. Moreover, several kinetic parameters among which the duration of absorption were found to be influenced by pharmaceutical dosage form and gender. Body weight and creatinine renal clearance were found to have a little influence on the oral clearance and the smallest disposition rate constant. This population analysis was validated on a separate group of 247 other patients. For each observed concentration of this sample, a predictive distribution was computed using the individual covariates. Predicted concentrations and standardized prediction errors were deduced. The mean and variance of the standardized prediction errors were, respectively, 0.21 and 2.79. Moreover, in the validation sample, the predicted cumulative distribution function of each observed concentration was computed. Empirical distribution of these values was not significantly different from a uniform distribution, as expected under the assumption that the population model estimated by NPML is adequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9795879     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020505722924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  12 in total

1.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

2.  Multiple solutions, illegal parameter values, local minima of the sum of squares, and anomalous parameter estimates in least-squares fitting of the two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with absorption.

Authors:  R D Purves
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-02

3.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of mizolastine in healthy young volunteers after single oral and intravenous doses: noncompartmental approach and compartmental modeling.

Authors:  F Mesnil; C Dubruc; F Mentre; S Huet; A Mallet; J P Thenot
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-04

4.  Comparison of population pharmacokinetic modeling methods using simulated data: results from the Population Modeling Workgroup.

Authors:  D J Roe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Evaluation of population (NONMEM) pharmacokinetic parameter estimates.

Authors:  S Vozeh; P O Maitre; D R Stanski
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1990-04

6.  An application of Bayesian population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to dose recommendation.

Authors:  J Wakefield; A Racine-Poon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 May 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Handling covariates in population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  F Mentré; A Mallet
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1994-06

8.  Determination of mizolastine, a new antihistaminic drug, in human plasma by liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase extraction and column-switching techniques in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  V Ascalone; P Guinebault; A Rouchouse
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1993-09-22

9.  Nonparametric estimation of population characteristics of the kinetics of lithium from observational and experimental data: individualization of chronic dosing regimen using a new Bayesian approach.

Authors:  N Taright; F Mentré; A Mallet; R Jouvent
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of nortriptyline during monotherapy and during concomitant treatment with drugs that inhibit CYP2D6--an evaluation with the nonparametric maximum likelihood method.

Authors:  M Jerling; Y Merlé; F Mentré; A Mallet
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prediction discrepancies for the evaluation of nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  France Mentré; Sylvie Escolano
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-11-13       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Metrics for external model evaluation with an application to the population pharmacokinetics of gliclazide.

Authors:  Karl Brendel; Emmanuelle Comets; Céline Laffont; Christian Laveille; France Mentré
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Why should prediction discrepancies be renamed standardized visual predictive check?

Authors:  Emmanuelle Comets; Karl Brendel; France Mentré
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 4.  How important are gender differences in pharmacokinetics?

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Ingrid Beierle; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis and optimization of the experimental design for mizolastine solution in children.

Authors:  F Mentré; C Dubruc; J P Thénot
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacology of new histamine H1 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  F E Simons; K J Simons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of mizolastine.

Authors:  B Lebrun-Vignes; B Diquet; O Chosidow
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral anticancer agent, in Western and Japanese patients.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Comets; Kazumasa Ikeda; Paulo Hoff; Pierre Fumoleau; Jantien Wanders; Yusuke Tanigawara
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Influence of the cytochrome P450 2B6 genotype on population pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in human immunodeficiency virus patients.

Authors:  Salvador E Cabrera; Dolores Santos; María P Valverde; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; Francisco González; Guillermo Luna; María J García
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Fundamentals of population pharmacokinetic modelling: validation methods.

Authors:  Catherine M T Sherwin; Tony K L Kiang; Michael G Spigarelli; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.