Literature DB >> 9408856

Pharmacokinetic analysis of mizolastine in healthy young volunteers after single oral and intravenous doses: noncompartmental approach and compartmental modeling.

F Mesnil1, C Dubruc, F Mentre, S Huet, A Mallet, J P Thenot.   

Abstract

This paper presents the analysis of the kinetics of a new antihistamine, mizolastine, in 18 healthy volunteers, from concentrations measured after an intravenous infusion and two different oral administrations: tablet and capsule. Two approaches were used to analyze these data: (i) a noncompartmental approach implemented in PHARM-NCA; (ii) a compartmental modeling approach implemented in a new S-PLUS library, NLS2, which allows the estimation of variance parameters simultaneously with the kinetic parameters. For the compartmental modeling approach, two-compartment open models were used. According to the Akaike criterion, the best model describing the kinetics of mizolastine after oral administration was the zero-order absorption model. The kinetic parameters obtained with PHARM-NCA and NLS2 were similar. The estimated duration of absorption was greater for the tablets than for the capsules (with means equal to 1.13 hr and 0.84 hr respectively). After an intravenous infusion, the mean estimated clearance was 4.9 L/hr, the mean lambda 2-phase apparent volume of distribution was 89.6 L and the mean terminal half-life was 12.9 hr.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9408856     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025775912051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Noncompartmental versus compartmental modelling in clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  W R Gillespie
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Evaluation of the utility of a proposed method for correcting for intrasubject variability in metabolic clearance in the bioavailability assessment of theophylline.

Authors:  Y Kasuya; T Furuta; H Shibasaki; H Shimota
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1991-02

3.  Fitting heteroscedastic regression models to individual pharmacokinetic data using standard statistical software.

Authors:  D M Giltinan; D Ruppert
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1989-10

4.  The assessment of bioavailability in the presence of nonlinear elimination.

Authors:  S D Hall; C B McAllister; G R Wilkinson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1988-06

5.  Estimation of bioavailability on a single occasion after semisimultaneous drug administration.

Authors:  M O Karlsson; U Bredberg
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Estimating bioavailability when clearance changes in time: the effect of model misspecification.

Authors:  K E Fattinger; D Verotta
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection.

Authors:  T M Ludden; S L Beal; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-10

8.  Determination of mizolastine, a new antihistaminic drug, in human plasma by liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase extraction and column-switching techniques in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  V Ascalone; P Guinebault; A Rouchouse
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1993-09-22

9.  Estimation of absolute bioavailability assuming steady state apparent volume of distribution remains constant.

Authors:  P S Collier; S Riegelman
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1983-04

10.  Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of mizolastine (SL 85.0324), a new nonsedative H1 antihistamine.

Authors:  P Rosenzweig; J J Thebault; H Caplain; C Dubruc; G Bianchetti; E Fuseau; P L Morselli
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1992-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mizolastine and validation from sparse data on patients using the nonparametric maximum likelihood method.

Authors:  F Mesnil; F Mentré; C Dubruc; J P Thénot; A Mallet
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-04

2.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis and optimization of the experimental design for mizolastine solution in children.

Authors:  F Mentré; C Dubruc; J P Thénot
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacology of new histamine H1 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  F E Simons; K J Simons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of mizolastine.

Authors:  B Lebrun-Vignes; B Diquet; O Chosidow
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Nonparametric population pharmacokinetic analysis of amikacin in neonates, infants, and children.

Authors:  J M Tréluyer; Y Merlé; S Tonnelier; E Rey; G Pons
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of SMT C1100, a 2-arylbenzoxazole utrophin modulator, following single- and multiple-dose administration to healthy male adult volunteers.

Authors:  Jon Tinsley; Neil Robinson; Kay E Davies
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.126

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.