Literature DB >> 9795579

Reducing need and demand for medical services in high-risk persons. A health education approach.

J F Fries1, D McShane.   

Abstract

We undertook this study to identify persons with high medical use to target them for health promotion and self-management interventions specific to their problems. We compared the reductions in cost and health risk of a health education program aimed at high-risk persons with a similar program addressed to all risk levels. We compared health risk and use in 2,586 high-risk persons with those of employee (N = 50,576) and senior (N = 39,076) groups and contrasted results in specific high-risk disease or behavior categories (modules)--arthritis, back pain, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, smoking, and obesity--against each other, using validated self-report measures, over a 6-month period. Interventions were a standard generic health education program and a similar program directed at high risk individuals (Healthtrac). Health risk scores improved by 11% in the overall high-risk group compared with 9% in the employee group and 6% in the senior group. Physician use decreased by 0.8 visits per 6 months in the high-risk group compared with 0.05 and 0.15 visits, respectively, per 6 months in the employee and senior groups. Hospital stays decreased by 0.2 days per 6 months in the high-risk group compared with 0.05 days in the comparison groups. The duration of illness or confinement to home decreased by 0.9 days per 6 months in the high-risk group and 0.15 and 0.25, respectively, in the employee and senior groups. Using imputed costs of $130 per physician visit, $1,000 per hospital day, and $200 per sick day, previous year costs were $1,138 in direct costs for the high-risk groups compared with $352 and $995 in the employee and senior groups, respectively. At 6 months, direct costs were reduced by $304 in the high-risk group compared with $57 and $70 in the comparison groups. Total costs were reduced $484 in the high-risk groups compared with $87 in the employee group and $120 in the senior group. The return on investment was about 6:1 in the high-risk group compared with 4:1 in the comparison groups. Effective health education programs can result in larger changes in use and costs in high-risk persons than in unscreened persons, justifying more intensive educational interventions in high-risk groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9795579      PMCID: PMC1305287     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  25 in total

1.  Randomized controlled study of a retiree health promotion program. The Bank of American Study.

Authors:  J P Leigh; N Richardson; R Beck; C Kerr; H Harrington; C L Parcell; J F Fries
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-06

2.  The effects of workplace health promotion on absenteeism and employment costs in a large industrial population.

Authors:  R L Bertera
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A preliminary investigation: effect of a corporate fitness program on absenteeism and health care cost.

Authors:  W B Baun; E J Bernacki; S P Tsai
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-01

4.  Impact of worksite health promotion on health care costs and utilization. Evaluation of Johnson & Johnson's Live for Life program.

Authors:  J L Bly; R C Jones; J E Richardson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-12-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The effect of self-care interventions on the use of medical service within a Medicare population.

Authors:  D M Vickery; T J Golaszewski; E C Wright; H Kalmer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The dimensions of health outcomes: a cross-validated examination of health status measurement.

Authors:  J H Brown; L E Kazis; P W Spitz; P Gertman; J F Fries; R F Meenan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Toward an understanding of patient outcome measurement.

Authors:  J F Fries
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1983-06

8.  The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales.

Authors:  J F Fries; P W Spitz; D Y Young
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Health promotion for educators: impact on absenteeism.

Authors:  S N Blair; M Smith; T R Collingwood; R Reynolds; M C Prentice; C L Sterling
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  A workplace health education program that reduces outpatient visits.

Authors:  K Lorig; R G Kraines; B W Brown; N Richardson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  5 in total

1.  Health risks of obesity.

Authors:  A M Ogunbode; A A Fatiregun; O O Ogunbode
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2009-12

Review 2.  Strategies for Worksite Health Interventions to Employees with Elevated Risk of Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Lu Meng; Marilyn B Wolff; Kelly A Mattick; David M DeJoy; Mark G Wilson; Matthew Lee Smith
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-12-02

3.  Facilitators and Barriers to Sustainable Employment After Spinal Cord Injury or Acquired Brain Injury: The Person's Perspective.

Authors:  Katarzyna Karcz; Barbara Schiffmann; Urban Schwegler; Stefan Staubli; Monika E Finger
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 4.  Can health promotion programs save Medicare money?

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; David Shechter; Ronald J Ozminkowski; David C Stapleton; Pauline J Lapin; J Michael McGinnis; Catherine R Gordon; Lester Breslow
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Effects of health risk assessment and counselling on physical activity in older people: A pragmatic randomised trial.

Authors:  Anna Marie Herghelegiu; André Moser; Gabriel Ioan Prada; Stephan Born; Matthias Wilhelm; Andreas E Stuck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.