Literature DB >> 3783867

Impact of worksite health promotion on health care costs and utilization. Evaluation of Johnson & Johnson's Live for Life program.

J L Bly, R C Jones, J E Richardson.   

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between exposure to a comprehensive worksite health promotion program and health care costs and utilization. The experience of two groups of Johnson & Johnson employees (N = 5192 and N = 3259) exposed to Live for Life, a comprehensive program of health screens, life-style improvement programs, and worksite changes to support healthier life-styles, was compared with that of a control group (N = 2955) over a five-year period. To account for baseline differences, analyses of covariance produced adjusted means for inpatient hospital costs, admissions, hospital days, outpatient costs, and other health costs. Mean annual inpatient cost increases were $43 and $42 for two Live for Life groups vs $76 for the non-Live for Life group. Live for Life groups also had lower rates of increase in hospital days and admissions. No significant differences were found for outpatient or other health care costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3783867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

1.  The economic burden of physical inactivity in Canada.

Authors:  P T Katzmarzyk; N Gledhill; R J Shephard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The effects of workplace health promotion on absenteeism and employment costs in a large industrial population.

Authors:  R L Bertera
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Reducing need and demand for medical services in high-risk persons. A health education approach.

Authors:  J F Fries; D McShane
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-10

4.  Overall well-being as a predictor of health care, productivity, and retention outcomes in a large employer.

Authors:  Lindsay E Sears; Yuyan Shi; Carter R Coberley; James E Pope
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  The views of low-income employees regarding mandated comprehensive employee benefits for the sake of health.

Authors:  Katherin A Adikes; Sara C Hull; Marion Danis
Journal:  Soc Work Public Health       Date:  2010-01

6.  Effect of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health and Economic Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zirui Song; Katherine Baicker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Comprehensive periodic health examination: impact on health care utilisation and costs in a working population in Japan.

Authors:  A Ren; T Okubo; K Takahashi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  First-year results of an obesity prevention program at The Dow Chemical Company.

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; Kristin M Baker; Meghan E Short; Xiaofei Pei; Ronald J Ozminkowski; Shaohung Wang; Jennie D Bowen; Enid C Roemer; Beth A Craun; Karen J Tully; Catherine M Baase; David M DeJoy; Mark G Wilson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 9.  Can organizations benefit from worksite health promotion?

Authors:  L C Leviton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.

Authors:  Luke Wolfenden; Sharni Goldman; Fiona G Stacey; Alice Grady; Melanie Kingsland; Christopher M Williams; John Wiggers; Andrew Milat; Chris Rissel; Adrian Bauman; Margaret M Farrell; France Légaré; Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Rebecca K Hodder; Jannah Jones; Debbie Booth; Benjamin Parmenter; Tim Regan; Sze Lin Yoong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.