Literature DB >> 9794859

Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team.

A L Kinmonth1, A Woodcock, S Griffin, N Spiegal, M J Campbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of additional training of practice nurses and general practitioners in patient centred care on the lifestyle and psychological and physiological status of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN: Pragmatic parallel group design, with randomisation between practice teams to routine care (comparison group) or routine care plus additional training (intervention group); analysis at one year, allowing for practice effects and stratifiers; self reporting by patients on communication with practitioners, satisfaction with treatment, style of care, and lifestyle.
SETTING: 41 practices (21 in intervention group, 20 in comparison group) in a health region in southern England.
SUBJECTS: 250/360 patients (aged 30-70 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and completing follow up at one year (142 in intervention group, 108 in comparison group). INTERVENTION: 1.5 days' group training for the doctors and nurses-introducing evidence for and skills of patient centred care and a patient held booklet encouraging questions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life, wellbeing, haemoglobin A1c and lipid concentrations, blood pressure, body mass index (kg/m2).
RESULTS: Compared with patients in the C group, those in the intervention group reported better communication with the doctors (odds ratio 2.8; 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 4.3) and greater treatment satisfaction (1.6; 1.1 to 2.5) and wellbeing (difference in means (d) 2.8; 0.4 to 5.2). However, their body mass index was significantly higher (d=2.0; 0.3 to 3.8), as were triglyceride concentrations (d=0.4 mmol/l; 0.07 to 0.73 mmol/l), whereas knowledge scores were lower (d=-2.74; -0.23 to -5.25). Differences in lifestyle and glycaemic control were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest greater attention to the consultation process than to preventive care among trained practitioners; those committed to achieving the benefits of patient centred consulting should not lose the focus on disease management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9794859      PMCID: PMC28704          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  20 in total

1.  Evidence in consultations: interpreted and individualised.

Authors:  F M Sullivan; R J MacNaughton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-10-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Dietary and exercise assessment in general practice.

Authors:  P Little; B Margetts
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Diabetes care from diagnosis: effects of training in patient-centred care on beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of primary care professionals.

Authors:  A J Woodcock; A L Kinmonth; M J Campbell; S J Griffin; N M Spiegal
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-05

5.  Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.

Authors:  M A Stewart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community.

Authors:  G Godin; R J Shephard
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1985-09

7.  Developing a training programme in patient-centred consulting for evaluation in a randomised controlled trial; diabetes care from diagnosis in British primary care.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; N Spiegal; A Woodcock
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1996-10

Review 8.  Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance.

Authors:  D L Roter
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1977

9.  Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment.

Authors:  L Roe; C Strong; C Whiteside; A Neil; D Mant
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  122 in total

1.  Patient centred care of diabetes in general practice. Doctors and nurses must understand meaning of "communication".

Authors:  J Skelton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-12

Review 2.  Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer?

Authors:  D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-10

Review 3.  Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making.

Authors:  A Towle; W Godolphin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

4.  Self care.

Authors:  R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-04

5.  Towards a global definition of patient centred care.

Authors:  M Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

6.  Managing chronic disease.

Authors:  R M Davis; E H Wagner; T Groves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-24

Review 7.  Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

Authors:  S Wilson; B C Delaney; A Roalfe; L Roberts; V Redman; A M Wearn; F D Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-01

8.  The management of diabetes.

Authors:  S J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-27

9.  Guided self management plans for asthma. Advice should be simple and patient focused.

Authors:  M Partridge; G Barnes; D Price; J Barnes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

Review 10.  Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings.

Authors:  C M Renders; G D Valk; S Griffin; E H Wagner; J T Eijk; W J Assendelft
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.