Literature DB >> 8902518

Dietary and exercise assessment in general practice.

P Little1, B Margetts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diet and physical activity are important in many conditions managed in primary care. Dietary and physical activity assessment is complex, has inherent inaccuracies related to self-reporting, and is only a small part of a larger context of developing effective intervention in primary care. However, for personalized assessment in routine clinical care, and for the assessment of different intervention strategies in a general practice research setting, validated life-style assessment tools are needed.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to discuss the requirements for assessment tools and to identify feasible validated assessment instruments for use in primary care.
METHOD: Potential tools were identified from a Medline search, UK Research Intelligence, and contact with groups known to be working in the area.
RESULTS: Several brief instruments assess mainly fat in the US diet, but the limited range of foods covered and the setting of studies limits their generalizability. Only one tool developed for UK use--'DINE', which scores total fat, fibre and unsaturated fat--was identified which is both feasible and has documented reasonable validated characteristics. Even for this tool there are doubts about the validation "standard'. No diet or physical activity validation studies have used both subjects and health professionals from general practice settings.
CONCLUSION: There are very few feasible and validated dietary or physical activity assessment tools for use in clinical care or research in general practice, and doubts about the design and settings of published validation studies. Further research is needed to validate and develop a range of feasible life-style assessment tools with specified time and training requirements for use in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8902518     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/13.5.477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  6 in total

1.  Can dietary assessment in general practice target patients with unhealthy diets?

Authors:  P Little; J Barnett; A L Kinmonth; B Margetts; J Gabbay; R Thompson; D Warm; S Wooton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The validity of dietary assessment in general practice.

Authors:  P Little; J Barnett; B Margetts; A L Kinmonth; J Gabbay; R Thompson; D Warm; H Warwick; S Wooton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  The relationship between HbA1c level, symptoms and self-rated health in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Anni B S Nielsen; Dorte Gannik; Volkert Siersma; Niels de Fine Olivarius
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; A Woodcock; S Griffin; N Spiegal; M J Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

5.  Characteristics of men and women with diabetes: observations during patients' initial visit to a diabetes education centre.

Authors:  Enza Gucciardi; Shirley Chi-Tyan Wang; Margaret DeMelo; Lina Amaral; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Change in self-rated general health is associated with perceived illness burden: a 1-year follow up of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Anni Brit Sternhagen Nielsen; Per Jensen; Dorte Gannik; Susanne Reventlow; Hanne Hollnagel; Niels de Fine Olivarius
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.