Literature DB >> 7895964

Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment.

L Roe1, C Strong, C Whiteside, A Neil, D Mant.   

Abstract

Primary health care staff are involved increasingly in the provision of dietary advice for health promotion, often without adequate training in nutrition assessment or counselling. At present no brief diet assessment methods are available which have been validated for this purpose in the UK. We report on the accuracy of the Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education (DINE) in classifying dietary fat and fibre intakes. This structured questionnaire can be administered and scored in under 10 minutes by primary care staff without specialized nutritional knowledge, and includes a dietary counselling component. The classification of fat and fibre intakes as low, medium or high by the DINE method was compared to that of a detailed 4-day diet record in a population of 206 factory workers. There was exact agreement of categorization for 53% of fat intakes and 52% of fibre intakes, and only 6% of fat intakes and 5% of fibre intakes were grossly misclassified (placed in a high category by one method and a low category by another). Pearson correlation coefficients between the two methods were 0.51 for fat, 0.46 for fibre and 0.43 for the polyunsaturated:saturated fat ratio. The DINE method is a brief and inexpensive tool for diet assessment in primary care health promotion programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7895964     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  102 in total

1.  Can dietary assessment in general practice target patients with unhealthy diets?

Authors:  P Little; J Barnett; A L Kinmonth; B Margetts; J Gabbay; R Thompson; D Warm; S Wooton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of change in fat intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  A Steptoe; S Kerry; E Rink; S Hilton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practice.

Authors:  N C Campbell; J Thain; H G Deans; L D Ritchie; J M Rawles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-09

4.  Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care.

Authors:  N C Campbell; L D Ritchie; J Thain; H G Deans; J M Rawles; J L Squair
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Evaluation of health promotion programmes in severe mental illness: theory and practice.

Authors:  Fenneke M van Hasselt; Paul F M Krabbe; Maarten J Postma; Anton J M Loonen
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Improving health engagement and lifestyle management for breast cancer survivors with diabetes.

Authors:  Rebecca A Shelby; Caroline S Dorfman; Sarah S Arthur; Hayden B Bosworth; Leonor Corsino; Linda Sutton; Lynda Owen; Alaattin Erkanli; Francis Keefe; Cheyenne Corbett; Gretchen Kimmick
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; A Woodcock; S Griffin; N Spiegal; M J Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

8.  Preventing disease through opportunistic, rapid engagement by primary care teams using behaviour change counselling (PRE-EMPT): protocol for a general practice-based cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Clio Spanou; Sharon A Simpson; Kerry Hood; Adrian Edwards; David Cohen; Stephen Rollnick; Ben Carter; Jim McCambridge; Laurence Moore; Elizabeth Randell; Timothy Pickles; Christine Smith; Claire Lane; Fiona Wood; Hazel Thornton; Chris C Butler
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Effect of tailored practice and patient care plans on secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A W Murphy; M E Cupples; S M Smith; M Byrne; M C Byrne; J Newell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-29

10.  Realising the potential of the family history in risk assessment and primary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: ADDFAM study protocol.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Sarah Armstrong; Paula Saukko; Tracey Sach; Jo Middlemass; Phil H Evans; Joe Kai; Hannah Farrimond; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.