Literature DB >> 9791934

Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling.

V M Zatsiorsky1, Z M Li, M L Latash.   

Abstract

During maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with several fingers, the following three phenomena are observed: (1) the total force produced by all the involved fingers is shared among the fingers in a specific manner (sharing); (2) the force produced by a given finger in a multi-finger task is smaller than the force generated by this finger in a single-finger task (force deficit); (3) the fingers that are not required to produce any force by instruction are involuntary activated (enslaving). We studied involuntary force production by individual fingers (enslaving effects, EE) during tasks when (an)other finger(s) of the hand generated maximal voluntary pressing force in isometric conditions. The subjects (n = 10) were instructed to press as hard as possible on the force sensors with one, two, three and four fingers acting in parallel in all possible combinations. The EE were (A) large, the slave fingers always producing a force ranging from 10.9% to 54.7% of the maximal force produced by the finger in the single-finger task; (B) nearly symmetrical; (C) larger for the neighboring fingers; and (D) non-additive. In most cases, the EE from two or three fingers were smaller than the EE from at least one finger (this phenomenon was coined occlusion). The occlusion cannot be explained only by anatomical musculo-tendinous connections. Therefore, neural factors contribute substantially to the EE. A neural network model that accounts for all the three effects has been developed. The model consists of three layers: the input layer that models a central neural drive; the hidden layer modeling transformation of the central drive into an input signal to the muscles serving several fingers simultaneously (multi-digit muscles); and the output layer representing finger force output. The output of the hidden layer is set inversely proportional to the number of fingers involved. In addition, direct connections between the input and output layers represent signals to the hand muscles serving individual fingers (uni-digit muscles). The network was validated using three different training sets. Single digit muscles contributed from 25% to 50% of the total finger force. The master matrix and the enslaving matrix were computed; they characterize the ability of a given finger to enslave other fingers and its ability to be enslaved. Overall, the neural network modeling suggests that no direct correspondence exists between neural command to an individual finger and finger force. To produce a desired finger force, a command sent to an intended finger should be scaled in accordance with the commands sent to the other fingers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9791934     DOI: 10.1007/s004220050466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  106 in total

1.  The effect of fatigue on multifinger co-ordination in force production tasks in humans.

Authors:  F Danion; M L Latash; Z M Li; V M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Optimization-based models of muscle coordination.

Authors:  Boris I Prilutsky; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.230

3.  The effect of a fatiguing exercise by the index finger on single- and multi-finger force production tasks.

Authors:  F Danion; M L Latash; Z M Li; V M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Finger interaction during multi-finger tasks involving finger addition and removal.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Prehension synergies: effects of object geometry and prescribed torques.

Authors:  V M Zatsiorsky; F Gao; M L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. II. Control.

Authors:  Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Robert W Gregory; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. I. Biomechanics.

Authors:  Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Robert W Gregory; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Changes in finger coordination and responses to single pulse TMS of motor cortex during practice of a multifinger force production task.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Kielan Yarrow; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Differences in the abilities of individual fingers during the performance of fast, repetitive tapping movements.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Peter R Francis; Hiroshi Kinoshita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.