Literature DB >> 12898096

Differences in the abilities of individual fingers during the performance of fast, repetitive tapping movements.

Tomoko Aoki1, Peter R Francis, Hiroshi Kinoshita.   

Abstract

Using 12 healthy male subjects, the dynamic motor ability of individual fingers was investigated under four different finger tapping conditions. These were: maximum speed tapping with one finger (single-finger tapping), alternate movement of two fingers (double-finger tapping), double-finger tapping in an unsupported condition, and submaximum constant speed tapping with one finger in a passive manner. Key-contact forces for all fingers and the movement velocity of the tapping finger were monitored. With the exception of the unsupported condition, non-tapping fingers were maintained in contact with designated keys during the tapping tasks. It was found that the index finger attained the fastest cadence and greatest movement velocity, followed by the middle, little and ring fingers, respectively. Subjective assessment of rank order of "difficulty" of tapping by the subjects was highly correlated with tapping cadence. Thus dynamic motor function, as indicated by rapid, repetitive movement, differs among the individual fingers. Parallel changes were observed in the key-contact force of the neighboring non-tapping fingers during tapping. The range of the non-tapping finger forces was largest during tapping by the ring finger. A similar trend was found for passive tapping, during which the magnitude of key-contact force was less than one-third of that observed during active tapping. The lower cadence achieved by the ring finger may be attributed more to a lack of independence at the level of voluntary neuromuscular control, than to innate mechanical interaction with the other fingers. Tapping cadence of each finger was lower for the double-finger mode than for the single-finger mode. The magnitude of the observed decrease in cadence during double-finger tapping was, on the other hand, strongly dependent on finger-combination. The decrease was smallest for the index-middle finger-combination, and greatest for the ring-little finger-combination. Compatibilities with other fingers can play an essential role in the dynamic motor function of individual fingers. During the unsupported task, in which interactions were diminished by allowing all fingers to move freely, tapping cadence increased markedly. Therefore, the lower cadences observed in specific finger-combinations may be partly attributed to anatomical and neural interdigit interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898096     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1552-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Dissociation of supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex in human subjects when comparing index and little finger movements with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Erdler; C Windischberger; R Lanzenberger; V Edward; A Gartus; L Deecke; R Beisteiner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Temporal and force characteristics of fast double-finger, single-finger and hand tapping.

Authors:  T Aoki; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists.

Authors:  L Jäncke; N J Shah; M Peters
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

4.  External finger forces in submaximal five-finger static pinch prehension.

Authors:  R G Radwin; S Oh; T R Jensen; J G Webster
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling.

Authors:  V M Zatsiorsky; Z M Li; M L Latash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Corticomotoneuronal postspike effects in shoulder, elbow, wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand muscles during a reach and prehension task.

Authors:  B J McKiernan; J K Marcario; J H Karrer; P D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The functional significance of the long extensors and juncturae tendinum in finger extension.

Authors:  H P von Schroeder; M J Botte
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Patterns of static prehension in normal hands.

Authors:  N Kamakura; M Matsuo; H Ishii; F Mitsuboshi; Y Miura
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1980-07

10.  Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans.

Authors:  M Van Cutsem; J Duchateau; K Hainaut
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  18 in total

1.  The effect of tapping finger and mode differences on cortical and subcortical activities: a PET study.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Hayato Tsuda; Masashi Takasawa; Yasuhiro Osaki; Naohiko Oku; Jun Hatazawa; Hiroshi Kinoshita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Constraints for control of the human hand.

Authors:  Hiske van Duinen; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Similarity in the dynamics of contralateral motor overflow through increasing frequency of movement in a single limb.

Authors:  S Morrison; S L Hong; K M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Unintentional force drifts across the human fingers: implications for the neural control of finger tasks.

Authors:  Valters Abolins; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Being discrete helps keep to the beat.

Authors:  M T Elliott; A E Welchman; A M Wing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The statistics of natural hand movements.

Authors:  James N Ingram; Konrad P Körding; Ian S Howard; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A novel method for the quantification of key components of manual dexterity after stroke.

Authors:  Maxime Térémetz; Florence Colle; Sonia Hamdoun; Marc A Maier; Påvel G Lindberg
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Sense of ownership and not the sense of agency is spatially bounded within the space reachable with the unaugmented hand.

Authors:  Madhur Mangalam; Sarah A Cutts; Dorothy M Fragaszy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Virtual reality as a tool for evaluation of repetitive rhythmic movements in the elderly and Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Pablo Arias; Verónica Robles-García; Gabriel Sanmartín; Julian Flores; Javier Cudeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Distant functional connectivity for bimanual finger coordination declines with aging: an fMRI and SEM exploration.

Authors:  Sachiko Kiyama; Mitsunobu Kunimi; Tetsuya Iidaka; Toshiharu Nakai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.