Literature DB >> 9790696

Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: attractive males choose big females, which lay big eggs.

.   

Abstract

Brighter red three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, males have been shown to be preferred by females in the laboratory but in the field, these males did not receive more eggs. Instead, they had heavier eggs in their brood. We investigated the hypothesis that sexual selection for red coloration in male sticklebacks acts through mate choice by preferred males, who can afford to be choosy, for high-quality females which lay heavier eggs. We assume here that heavier eggs provide a direct fitness advantage. In simultaneous choice tests males were presented with two females differing in size. The number of zigzags directed to and the time spent orienting to each female were measured. After the test the females laid eggs, which we counted and weighed. Bigger (i.e. longer and heavier) females laid significantly more and heavier eggs than smaller females. For all 23 males pooled together, the preferred female was the bigger of the two in 17 cases, laid more eggs in 18 cases, but laid heavier eggs in only 13 cases. When bright and dull males were analysed separately, we found that bright but not dull males spent more time oriented to the bigger female, and to the female that laid more eggs. Females preferred by bright males tended to lay heavier eggs than nonpreferred females, although this result was not quite significant. We conclude that in nature this preference for bigger females results in brighter males receiving on average heavier eggs. Assuming higher survival of bigger offspring, we propose that this can explain how brightness can be sexually selected in spite of brighter males not receiving more eggs. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790696     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  25 in total

1.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish.

Authors:  T Amundsen; E Forsgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in both sexes of a moth.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Qiao Wang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-05-15

4.  Male mate choice influences female promiscuity in Soay sheep.

Authors:  B T Preston; I R Stevenson; J M Pemberton; D W Coltman; K Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Costly major histocompatibility complex signals produced only by reproductively active males, but not females, must be validated by a 'maleness signal' in three-spined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Manfred Milinski; Siân W Griffiths; Thorsten B H Reusch; Thomas Boehm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Early growth trajectories affect sexual responsiveness.

Authors:  Who-Seung Lee; Neil B Metcalfe; Denis Réale; Pedro R Peres-Neto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Personality traits change after an opportunity to mate.

Authors:  Chloé Monestier; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections.

Authors:  I Barber; S A Arnott; V A Braithwaite; J Andrew; F A Huntingford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Sebastian A Baldauf; Harald Kullmann; Stefanie H Schroth; Timo Thünken; Theo C M Bakker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.