Literature DB >> 20473478

Form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in both sexes of a moth.

Jin Xu1, Qiao Wang.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is a process that operates through intrasexual competition and intersexual choice for reproduction in both sexes. Here, we report our work on a polygamous moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), aiming to infer the form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in males and females. We show that, although a number of traits measured in each sex are correlated with mating success, the primary selection trait in females appears to be abdominal thickness and that in males is aedeagus length. As the female's abdominal thickness is a reliable signal about the number and developmental stage of eggs, males who select females with thicker abdomens for mating will gain reproductive benefit, i.e., fertilizing more mature eggs. For females, earlier maturation of their eggs makes the females more likely to achieve mating earlier in an uncertain world where there is no guarantee that they will find more males in the future. Sexual selection appears to be the important force behind the evolution of fast egg maturation in females. We show that, under a male-biased sex ratio, more than 20% of mating fails within a few minutes after the aedeagus has penetrated into the female's genitalia, suggesting that females can assess the features of the male aedeagus before allowing insemination to occur. Dissection and examination of both sexes suggest that a longer aedeagus enhances mating and fertilization efficiency in this species, supporting the notion that sexual selection is a primary force in the evolution of genital variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473478     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-010-0676-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  26 in total

1.  Sexual selection and genital evolution.

Authors:  David J Hosken; Paula Stockley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Accommodating natural and sexual selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Oliver; Kendra A Robertson; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Contrasting sexual selection on males and females in a role-reversed swarming dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Diptera: Empididae).

Authors:  L F Bussière; D T Gwynne; R Brooks
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Stephen P Hubbell
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: APPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Courtship role reversal and deceptive signals in the long-tailed dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Viability selection on prey morphology by a generalist predator.

Authors:  A P Møller; G Couderc; J T Nielsen
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variation in pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male genital size in two species of lygaeid bug.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; David M Shuker
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.980

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.