Literature DB >> 9787042

Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis.

.   

Abstract

Hypotheses proposed to explain the formation of mixed-species foraging groups have focused on both foraging and antipredation benefits. Mixed-species flocks of bark-foraging birds form during the winter in the eastern deciduous forests of North America. These flocks are composed of two parid nuclear species, tufted titmice, Baeolophus bicolor, and either Carolina or black-capped chickadees, Poecile carolinensis or P. atricapillus, and several satellite species including downy woodpeckers, Picoides pubescens, and white-breasted nuthatches, Sitta carolinensis. The parid nuclear species seem to act as flock leaders and are closely followed by the satellite species. To elucidate what advantages downy woodpeckers and white-breasted nuthatches gain by flocking with parids, we removed parids from eight Ohio woodlots isolated by surrounding agricultural fields and compared the woodpeckers and nuthatches in these woodlots to those in eight controls. We tested four predictions generated by group-foraging hypotheses: compared with controls, satellite birds in treatment woodlots should (1) forage more in microclimates that reduce metabolic costs, (2) increase their vigilance, (3) exhibit reduced nutritional condition and (4) exhibit higher mortality rates. As predicted, female downy woodpeckers in treatment woodlots tended to forage in locations that were more sheltered from wind, presumably thereby reducing metabolic costs. Treatment males and females of both species significantly increased their vigilance. Finally, in the absence of parids, male nuthatches showed significantly reduced nutritional condition according to ptilochronology analysis of feathers grown during the experimental manipulation, and tended to exhibit increased mortality Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9787042     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  20 in total

1.  Shoal and prey patch choice by co-occurring fishes and prawns: inter-taxa use of socially transmitted cues.

Authors:  M M Webster; A J W Ward; P J B Hart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Does mixed-species flocking influence how birds respond to a gradient of land-use intensity?

Authors:  Christos Mammides; Jin Chen; Uromi Manage Goodale; Sarath Wimalabandara Kotagama; Swati Sidhu; Eben Goodale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Importance of intraspecifically gregarious species in a tropical bird community.

Authors:  Hari Sridhar; Kartik Shanker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Behavioral Hypervolumes of Predator Groups and Predator-Predator Interactions Shape Prey Survival Rates and Selection on Prey Behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Kimberly A Howell; Shaniqua J Gladney; Yusan Yang; James L L Lichtenstein; Michelle Elise Spicer; Sebastian A Echeverri; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The presence of an avian co-forager reduces vigilance in a cooperative mammal.

Authors:  Lynda L Sharpe; Abigail S Joustra; Michael I Cherry
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Active formation of mixed-species grouse leks: a role for predation in lek evolution?

Authors:  Robert M Gibson; Andrea S Aspbury; Leonard L McDaniel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Interspecific differences in the visual system and scanning behavior of three forest passerines that form heterospecific flocks.

Authors:  Bret A Moore; Megan Doppler; Jordan E Young; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls.

Authors:  Pamela M Fallow; Benjamin J Pitcher; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Lucy M Aplin; Ben C Sheldon; William Hoppitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  From Individuals to Groups and Back: The Evolutionary Implications of Group Phenotypic Composition.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Pierre-Olivier Montiglio; Orr Spiegel
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 17.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.