Literature DB >> 17986436

Shoal and prey patch choice by co-occurring fishes and prawns: inter-taxa use of socially transmitted cues.

M M Webster1, A J W Ward, P J B Hart.   

Abstract

Animals can use socially transmitted information to learn about the distribution and quality of resources without incurring the costs associated with having to search for and sample them first hand. Recently, it has been shown that the use of chemical social information specific to patterns of diet and habitat use is an important mechanism underpinning recognition and social organization in shoaling fishes. In this study we revealed that the use of resource-specific chemical information is not limited to conspecifics, or even members of the same taxon. In a series of laboratory experiments, we showed that threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) could recognize similar patterns of habitat use in common prawns (Leander serratus), preferentially orientating towards groups of prawns exposed to the same habitats as themselves, and even selecting foraging patches located close to them. Prawns were seen to use habitat-specific cues generated by conspecifics, but not by sticklebacks, suggesting that the benefits of forming these heterospecific social association patterns may be unequal for prawns and fishes. Our findings suggest that some species might use co-occurring, unrelated species as information centres in order to orient and locate resources within their surroundings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17986436      PMCID: PMC2596184          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

Review 1.  Social learning strategies.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Anti-predation benefits in a mixed-species group of Amazonian tamarins.

Authors:  C A Peres
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Isabelle Coolen; Yfke van Bergen; Rachel L Day; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Social recognition in wild fish populations.

Authors:  Ashley J W Ward; Michael M Webster; Paul J B Hart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.844

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Habitat-specific morphological variation among threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) within a drainage basin.

Authors:  Mike M Webster; Nicola Atton; Paul J B Hart; Ashley J W Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Local interactions and global properties of wild, free-ranging stickleback shoals.

Authors:  Ashley J W Ward; Timothy M Schaerf; James E Herbert-Read; Lesley Morrell; David J T Sumpter; Mike M Webster
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Familiarity affects social network structure and discovery of prey patch locations in foraging stickleback shoals.

Authors:  N Atton; B J Galef; W Hoppitt; M M Webster; K N Laland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.