Literature DB >> 26156772

Does mixed-species flocking influence how birds respond to a gradient of land-use intensity?

Christos Mammides1, Jin Chen1, Uromi Manage Goodale1, Sarath Wimalabandara Kotagama2, Swati Sidhu3, Eben Goodale4.   

Abstract

Conservation biology is increasingly concerned with preserving interactions among species such as mutualisms in landscapes facing anthropogenic change. We investigated how one kind of mutualism, mixed-species bird flocks, influences the way in which birds respond to different habitat types of varying land-use intensity. We use data from a well-replicated, large-scale study in Sri Lanka and the Western Ghats of India, in which flocks were observed inside forest reserves, in 'buffer zones' of degraded forest or timber plantations, and in areas of intensive agriculture. We find flocks affected the responses of birds in three ways: (i) species with high propensity to flock were more sensitive to land use; (ii) different flock types, dominated by different flock leaders, varied in their sensitivity to land use and because following species have distinct preferences for leaders, this can have a cascading effect on followers' habitat selection; and (iii) those forest-interior species that remain outside of forests were found more inside flocks than would be expected by chance, as they may use flocks more in suboptimal habitat. We conclude that designing policies to protect flocks and their leading species may be an effective way to conserve multiple bird species in mixed forest and agricultural landscapes.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anthropogenic disturbance; biodiversity loss; human-modified ecosystems; mixed-species bird flocks; mutualisms; species interaction networks

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156772      PMCID: PMC4528563          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments.

Authors:  J Terborgh; L Lopez; P Nuñez; M Rao; G Shahabuddin; G Orihuela; M Riveros; R Ascanio; G H Adler; T D Lambert; L Balbas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Ecology. Biotic multipliers of climate change.

Authors:  Phoebe L Zarnetske; David K Skelly; Mark C Urban
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world.

Authors:  Toby A Gardner; Jos Barlow; Robin Chazdon; Robert M Ewers; Celia A Harvey; Carlos A Peres; Navjot S Sodhi
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  The nuclear question: rethinking species importance in multi-species animal groups.

Authors:  Umesh Srinivasan; Rashid Hasnain Raza; Suhel Quader
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Decay of interspecific avian flock networks along a disturbance gradient in Amazonia.

Authors:  Karl Mokross; Thomas B Ryder; Marina Corrêa Côrtes; Jared D Wolfe; Philip C Stouffer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Positive relationships between association strength and phenotypic similarity characterize the assembly of mixed-species bird flocks worldwide.

Authors:  Hari Sridhar; Umesh Srinivasan; Robert A Askins; Julio Cesar Canales-Delgadillo; Chao-Chieh Chen; David N Ewert; George A Gale; Eben Goodale; Wendy K Gram; Patrick J Hart; Keith A Hobson; Richard L Hutto; Sarath W Kotagama; Jessie L Knowlton; Tien Ming Lee; Charles A Munn; Somchai Nimnuan; B Z Nizam; Guillaume Péron; V V Robin; Amanda D Rodewald; Paul G Rodewald; Robert L Thomson; Pranav Trivedi; Steven L Van Wilgenburg; Kartik Shanker
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size.

Authors:  Len Thomas; Stephen T Buckland; Eric A Rexstad; Jeff L Laake; Samantha Strindberg; Sharon L Hedley; Jon Rb Bishop; Tiago A Marques; Kenneth P Burnham
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.528

8.  Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.844

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Horizontal and vertical species turnover in tropical birds in habitats with differing land use.

Authors:  Rachakonda Sreekar; Richard T Corlett; Salindra Dayananda; Uromi Manage Goodale; Adam Kilpatrick; Sarath W Kotagama; Lian Pin Koh; Eben Goodale
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Flocking propensity by satellites, but not core members of mixed-species flocks, increases when individuals experience energetic deficits in a poor-quality foraging habitat.

Authors:  Katherine E Gentry; Daniel P Roche; Stephen G Mugel; Nolan D Lancaster; Kathryn E Sieving; Todd M Freeberg; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Using social network analysis of mixed-species groups in African savannah herbivores to assess how community structure responds to environmental change.

Authors:  Kristine Meise; Daniel W Franks; Jakob Bro-Jørgensen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Species co-occurrence and management intensity modulate habitat preferences of forest birds.

Authors:  Marco Basile; Thomas Asbeck; João M Cordeiro Pereira; Grzegorz Mikusiński; Ilse Storch
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  The formation of "mega-flocks" depends on vegetation structure in montane coniferous forests of Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Chieh Liao; Tzung-Su Ding; Chao-Chieh Chen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.