Literature DB >> 20473723

Post mortem examinations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: challenges and chances.

Paola Angelini1, Cynthia Hawkins, Normand Laperriere, Eric Bouffet, Ute Bartels.   

Abstract

The concept of organ donation for research purposes has evolved to overcome limited availability of tissue and foster research, in particular in diseases for which surgery is not routinely performed. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is an almost invariably fatal childhood tumour, not amenable to surgery because of its location and infiltrative nature. We report our institutional experience of post mortem brain or tumour donation and its impact on the families. Since July 2002, we have requested permission for post mortem brain examination for research purposes, from parents whose children succumbed to DIPG. Brain donation was discussed with 21 of 27 families of patients diagnosed with DIPG between July 2002 and June 2008 at the Hospital for Sick Children. Ten (47.6%) agreed, and autopsy was performed in 9 cases. Eight of these children died at home, one in the hospital. Autopsy was performed within 48 h from death in all cases except one. Pathological diagnosis was PNET in two and glioblastoma multiforme in seven patients. A disclosure of autopsy results was provided to all parents by the neuro-oncology team. None of the families expressed distress from the autopsy, or regretted the choice made. Autopsy limited to the brain did not interfere with the choices related to palliation. The families derived comfort from the hope that scientific breakthroughs could be made and felt that they were helping to make a difference in the future management of DIPG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473723     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0224-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  40 in total

1.  Family members' experiences of autopsy.

Authors:  F Oppewal; B Meyboom-de Jong
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 2.  The perinatal autopsy: pertinent issues in multicultural Western Europe.

Authors:  Sanne J Gordijn; Jan Jaap H M Erwich; T Yee Khong
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Resident physician opinions on autopsy importance and procurement.

Authors:  Mindy J Hull; Rosalynn M Nazarian; Amy E Wheeler; W Stephen Black-Schaffer; Eugene J Mark
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  The autopsy in pediatrics and pediatric oncology: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Tyler Buckner; Julie Blatt; Scott Victor Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

5.  Brainstem stereotactic biopsy sampling in children.

Authors:  David W Pincus; Erich O Richter; Anthony T Yachnis; Jeffrey Bennett; M Tariq Bhatti; Amy Smith
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Autopsy in children with cancer who die while in terminal care.

Authors:  K Sirkiä; U M Saarinen-Pihkala; L Hovi; H Sariola
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1998-05

7.  A clinicopathologic reappraisal of brain stem tumor classification. Identification of pilocystic astrocytoma and fibrillary astrocytoma as distinct entities.

Authors:  P G Fisher; S N Breiter; B S Carson; M D Wharam; J A Williams; J D Weingart; D R Foer; P T Goldthwaite; T Tihan; P C Burger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Management of a twenty-first century brain bank: experience in the BrainNet Europe consortium.

Authors:  Jeanne E Bell; Irina Alafuzoff; Safa Al-Sarraj; Thomas Arzberger; Nenad Bogdanovic; Herbert Budka; David T Dexter; Peter Falkai; Isidro Ferrer; Elena Gelpi; Steven M Gentleman; Giorgio Giaccone; Inge Huitinga; James W Ironside; Natasja Klioueva; Gabor G Kovacs; David Meyronet; Miklos Palkovits; Piero Parchi; Efstatios Patsouris; Richard Reynolds; Peter Riederer; Wolfgang Roggendorf; Danielle Seilhean; Andrea Schmitt; Peer Schmitz; Nathalie Streichenberger; Ameli Schwalber; Hans Kretzschmar
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect?

Authors:  E C Burton; D A Troxclair; W P Newman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Cultural perspectives of death, grief, and bereavement.

Authors:  Paul T Clements; Gloria J Vigil; Martin S Manno; Gloria C Henry; Jonathan Wilks; Rosie Kellywood; Wil Foster
Journal:  J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.098

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric brainstem gliomas: new understanding leads to potential new treatments for two very different tumors.

Authors:  Adam L Green; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: can optimism replace pessimism?

Authors:  Darren Hargrave
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2012-11

Review 3.  Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a reassessment.

Authors:  Nathan J Robison; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  The incidence of brainstem primitive neuroectodermal tumors of childhood based on SEER data.

Authors:  Omar Chamdine; Ghada Ahmad Saad Elhawary; Ahmad Samir Alfaar; Ibrahim Qaddoumi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: Time for Cautious Optimism.

Authors:  Tammy Hennika; Oren J Becher
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  Overcoming autopsy barriers in pediatric cancer research.

Authors:  Jennifer L Alabran; Jody E Hooper; Melissa Hill; Sandra E Smith; Kimberlee K Spady; Lara E Davis; Lauren S Peterson; Suman Malempati; Christopher W Ryan; Rae Acosta; Sheri L Spunt; Charles Keller
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Proceedings of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) Toronto Think Tank: advancing basic and translational research and cooperation in DIPG.

Authors:  Ute Bartels; Cynthia Hawkins; Gilbert Vézina; Larry Kun; Mark Souweidane; Eric Bouffet
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Disrupting NOTCH Slows Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Growth, Enhances Radiation Sensitivity, and Shows Combinatorial Efficacy With Bromodomain Inhibition.

Authors:  Isabella C Taylor; Marianne Hütt-Cabezas; William D Brandt; Madhuri Kambhampati; Javad Nazarian; Howard T Chang; Katherine E Warren; Charles G Eberhart; Eric H Raabe
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.685

9.  Comparative multidimensional molecular analyses of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma reveals distinct molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Amanda M Saratsis; Madhuri Kambhampati; Kendall Snyder; Sridevi Yadavilli; Joseph M Devaney; Brennan Harmon; Jordan Hall; Eric H Raabe; Ping An; Melanie Weingart; Brian R Rood; Suresh N Magge; Tobey J MacDonald; Roger J Packer; Javad Nazarian
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 17.088

10.  Diffuse intrinsic pontine tumors: a study of primitive neuroectodermal tumors versus the more common diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas.

Authors:  Alexandra Sufit; Andrew M Donson; Diane K Birks; Jeffrey A Knipstein; Laura Z Fenton; Paul Jedlicka; Todd C Hankinson; Michael H Handler; Nicholas K Foreman
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.