Literature DB >> 9785158

Use of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurse practitioners.

C J Mann1, I Grant, H Guly, P Hughes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of nurse practitioners to use the Ottawa ankle rules by comparing their requests for radiography with those of senior house officers (SHOs).
METHOD: 1365 patients were assessed by a nurse trained in the use of the Ottawa ankle rules. Where indicated the nurse sent the patient for radiography. 700 patients in the same period were seen by SHOs who had not received training in these rules. After three months the SHOs were similarly trained in the use of the rules and a further 700 patients were seen.
RESULTS: Nurse practitioners assessed 1365 patients; 72.6% had radiography. 1398 patients were seen only by an SHO. Before their use of the Ottawa ankle rules SHOs requested radiography in 91.0% (p = 0.001); using the rules this fell to 74.2% (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Nurse practitioners trained to use the Ottawa ankle rules are as effective as SHOs in the implementation of the rules. Moreover the sensitivity and specificity of the Ottawa ankle rules was similar to that seen in other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9785158      PMCID: PMC1343171          DOI: 10.1136/emj.15.5.315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med        ISSN: 1351-0622


  7 in total

1.  Should accident and emergency nurses request radiographs? Results of a multicentre evaluation.

Authors:  J Thurston; S Field
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03

2.  Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; R C Nair; I McDowell; M Reardon; J P Stewart; J Maloney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.

Authors:  A H Anis; I G Stiell; D G Stewart; A Laupacis
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.

Authors:  E C Pigman; R K Klug; S Sanford; B T Jolly
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.

Authors:  I Stiell; G Wells; A Laupacis; R Brison; R Verbeek; K Vandemheen; C D Naylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

6.  Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules.

Authors:  G M Lucchesi; R E Jackson; W F Peacock; C Cerasani; R A Swor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.

Authors:  I G Stiell; R D McKnight; G H Greenberg; I McDowell; R C Nair; G A Wells; C Johns; J R Worthington
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Establishing an emergency nurse practitioner service.

Authors:  J Bache
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.

Authors:  John Heyworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

3.  Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.

Authors:  J Heyworth
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  [The Ottawa ankle guidelines: analysis of their validity as clinical decision guidelines in the indication of X-rays for ankle and/or middle-foot injuries].

Authors:  P Garcés; S Gurucharri; C Ibiricu; M Izuel; J Mozo; P Buil; J Díez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 5.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

6.  Emergency nurse practitioners: a three part study in clinical and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  M Sakr; R Kendall; J Angus; A Sanders; J Nicholl; J Wardrope; A Saunders
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management.

Authors:  Carey Middleton McClellan; Fiona Cramp; Jane Powell; Jonathan Richard Benger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Knowledge Translation Tools are Emerging to Move Neck Pain Research into Practice.

Authors:  Joy C Macdermid; Jordan Miller; Anita R Gross
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.