Literature DB >> 9781404

Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: encoding flexibility under cognitive load?

J W Sherman1, A Y Lee, G R Bessenoff, L A Frost.   

Abstract

According to the encoding flexibility model, stereotypes are efficient because they facilitate, in different ways, the encoding of both stereotype-consistent and stereotype-inconsistent information when capacity is low. Because stereotypical information is conceptually fluent, it may be easily understood, even when resources are scant. As a result, processing resources may shift from stereotypical toward counterstereotypical information, which is difficult to comprehend under such conditions. Thus, whereas inconsistent information receives greater attention (Experiments 1-3) and perceptual encoding (Experiment 4) when resources are depleted, the conceptual meaning of consistent information is extracted to a greater degree under such conditions (Experiment 5). Potential moderating roles of stereotype strength and perceiver motivations are discussed, as are the implications of these results for dual process models of stereotyping.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9781404     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  14 in total

1.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Michele M Tugade; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Stereotype Strength and Attentional Bias: Preference for Confirming versus Disconfirming Information Depends on Processing Capacity.

Authors:  Thomas J Allen; Jeffrey W Sherman; Frederica R Conrey; Steven J Stroessner
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-09-01

3.  Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?

Authors:  Marie Luisa Schaper; Ute J Bayen; Carolin V Hey
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2022-08-10

4.  People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters.

Authors:  Linn M Persson; Johanna K Falbén; Dimitra Tsamadi; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-22

5.  Brain System for Social Categorization by Narrative Roles.

Authors:  Yorai Ron; Amnon Dafni-Merom; Noam Saadon-Grosman; Moshe Roseman; Uri Elias; Shahar Arzy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  This is not who you are: The posterior cerebellum and stereotype-inconsistent action sequences.

Authors:  Min Pu; Qianying Ma; Elien Heleven; Jeroen Delplanque; Kris Baetens; Naem Haihambo; Chris Baeken; Natacha Deroost; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Who can you trust? Behavioral and neural differences between perceptual and memory-based influences.

Authors:  John D Rudoy; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Schematic knowledge changes what judgments of learning predict in a source memory task.

Authors:  Agnieszka E Konopka; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-01

9.  The closed-mindedness that wasn't: need for structure and expectancy-inconsistent information.

Authors:  Markus Kemmelmeier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

10.  Assessing the automaticity of moral processing: efficient coding of moral information during narrative comprehension.

Authors:  Fionnuala C Murphy; Gemma Wilde; Neil Ogden; Philip J Barnard; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.