Literature DB >> 19103974

Schematic knowledge changes what judgments of learning predict in a source memory task.

Agnieszka E Konopka1, Aaron S Benjamin.   

Abstract

Source monitoring can be influenced by information that is external to the study context, such as beliefs and general knowledge (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993). We investigated the extent to which metamnemonic judgments predict memory for items and sources when schematic information about the sources is or is not provided at encoding. Participants made judgments of learning (JOLs) to statements presented by two speakers and were informed of the occupation of each speaker either before or after the encoding session. Replicating earlier work, prior knowledge decreased participants' tendency to erroneously attribute statements to schematically consistent but episodically incorrect speakers. The origin of this effect can be understood by examining the relationship between JOLs and performance: JOLs were equally predictive of item and source memory in the absence of prior knowledge, but were exclusively predictive of source memory when participants knew of the relationship between speakers and statements during study. Background knowledge determines the information that people solicit in service of metamnemonic judgments, suggesting that these judgments reflect control processes during encoding that reduce schematic errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19103974      PMCID: PMC2707275          DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.1.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

Review 1.  Toward a psychology of memory accuracy.

Authors:  A Koriat; M Goldsmith; A Pansky
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  On the relationship between recognition speed and accuracy for words rehearsed via rote versus elaborative rehearsal.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; R A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time.

Authors:  Michelle Rae Tuckey; Neil Brewer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-06

4.  Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Robert A Bjork; Limor Sheffer; Sarah K Bar
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-12

5.  Gender and orientation stereotypes bias source-monitoring attributions.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Gabriel I Cook; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-02

6.  Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: encoding flexibility under cognitive load?

Authors:  J W Sherman; A Y Lee; G R Bessenoff; L A Frost
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-09

7.  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.

Authors:  L K Son; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task.

Authors:  D A Smith; A C Graesser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-11

9.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; R A Bjork; B L Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-03

10.  Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame.

Authors:  M R Banaji; A G Greenwald
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?

Authors:  Marie Luisa Schaper; Ute J Bayen; Carolin V Hey
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2022-08-10

2.  Executive Resources and Item-Context Binding: Exploring the Influence of Concurrent Inhibition, Updating, and Shifting Tasks on Context Memory.

Authors:  Marek Nieznański; Michał Obidziński; Emilia Zyskowska; Daria Niedziałkowska
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

3.  Predicting and remembering the behaviors of social targets: how prediction accuracy affects episodic memory.

Authors:  Onyinye J Udeogu; Andrea N Frankenstein; Allison M Sklenar; Pauline Urban Levy; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-04-09

4.  Increasing control improves further control, but it does not enhance memory for the targets in a face-word Stroop task.

Authors:  Luis Jiménez; Cástor Méndez; Oscar Agra; Javier Ortiz-Tudela
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.