Literature DB >> 20161043

Stereotype Strength and Attentional Bias: Preference for Confirming versus Disconfirming Information Depends on Processing Capacity.

Thomas J Allen1, Jeffrey W Sherman, Frederica R Conrey, Steven J Stroessner.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the relationships among stereotype strength, processing capacity, and the allocation of attention to stereotype-consistent versus stereotype-inconsistent information describing a target person. The results of both experiments showed that, with full capacity, greater stereotype strength was associated with increased attention toward stereotype-consistent versus stereotype-inconsistent information. However, when capacity was diminished, greater stereotype strength was associated with increased attention toward inconsistent versus consistent information. Thus, strong stereotypes may act as self-confirming filters when processing capacity is plentiful, but as efficient information gathering devices that maximize the acquisition of novel (disconfirming) information when capacity is depleted. Implications for models of stereotyping and stereotype change are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161043      PMCID: PMC2753983          DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1031


  11 in total

1.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

3.  Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; T Andrew Poehlman; Eric Luis Uhlmann; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-07

4.  Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: encoding flexibility under cognitive load?

Authors:  J W Sherman; A Y Lee; G R Bessenoff; L A Frost
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-09

5.  Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures.

Authors:  B Wittenbrink; C M Judd; B Park
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-02

6.  Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory.

Authors:  T K Srull; M Lichtenstein; M Rothbart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity.

Authors:  G V Bodenhausen; M Lichtenstein
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-05

8.  Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  B P Bradley; K Mogg; J White; C Groom; J de Bono
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-09

9.  Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: attention, attribution, and individuation.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Sherman; Steven J Stroessner; Frederica R Conrey; Omar A Azam
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-10

10.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon.

Authors:  B K Payne
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures.

Authors:  Patrick S Forscher; Calvin K Lai; Jordan R Axt; Charles R Ebersole; Michelle Herman; Patricia G Devine; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-06-13

2.  Effects of Aging Stereotype Threat on Working Self-Concepts: An Event-Related Potentials Approach.

Authors:  Baoshan Zhang; Yao Lin; Qianyun Gao; Magdalena Zawisza; Qian Kang; Xuhai Chen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.