Literature DB >> 9779652

Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris.

P J Capizzi1, R P Clay, M J Battey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: With the increasing use of laser resurfacing, concerns have arisen about the biological hazards associated with the procedure. This study analyzed the potential bacterial and viral exposure to operating room personnel as a result of the laser smoke plume in CO2 laser resurfacing. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients underwent CO2 laser resurfacing. A HEPA filter in the smoke evacuator was used to collect specimens of the laser plume smoke for cultures. The study was controlled by a second filter exposed to room air.
RESULTS: The 13 patients each had one bacterial, one viral, and one control culture (total, 39 specimens). In the control group, none of the 13 specimens had any growth. No viral growth has been found to date. Of 13 bacterial cultures, 5 resulted in growth of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Of these five positive specimens, one also had growth of Corynebacterium and one had growth of Neisseria.
CONCLUSION: The potential exists for operating personnel to be exposed to viable bacteria during laser resurfacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9779652     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1998)23:3<172::aid-lsm7>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  32 in total

1.  Surgical Smoke Simulation Study: Physical Characterization and Respiratory Protection.

Authors:  Yousef Elmashae; Richard H Koehler; Michael Yermakov; Tiina Reponen; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 2.  Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.

Authors:  Kae Okoshi; Katsutoshi Kobayashi; Koichi Kinoshita; Yasuko Tomizawa; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Mowbray; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Safety considerations for Health care Workers involved in Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Sourabh Mittal; K S Gopinath
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02

5.  Metagenomic analysis of the dust particles collected from the suction tube and the suction funnel of a dermatological laser smoke evacuator system.

Authors:  Ga-Eun Lee; Jin Ju Kim; Hei Sung Kim; Woo Jun Sul
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Gaseous and Particulate Content of Laser Tattoo Removal Plume.

Authors:  Yakir S Levin; Michael P Grant; Eric Glassford; Brett J Green; Angela R Lemons; Mathew M Avram
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.914

7.  Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Kim Cocks; Stuart Goddard; Richard Whiston; Michael Stechman; David Scott-Coombes; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Electrosurgical Smoke: Ultrafine Particle Measurements and Work Environment Quality in Different Operating Theatres.

Authors:  Francesco Romano; Jan Gustén; Stefano De Antonellis; Cesare M Joppolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The characterization of surgical smoke from various tissues and its implications for occupational safety.

Authors:  Markus Karjalainen; Anton Kontunen; Sampo Saari; Topi Rönkkö; Jukka Lekkala; Antti Roine; Niku Oksala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Society of Robotic Surgery review: recommendations regarding the risk of COVID-19 transmission during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  James Porter; Elliot Blau; Farid Gharagozloo; Martin Martino; Robert Cerfolio; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Aileen Caceres; Ketan Badani; Sam Bhayani; Justin Collins; Rafael Coelho; Bernard Rocco; Peter Wiklund; Senthil Nathan; Eduardo Parra-Davila; Carlos Ortiz-Ortiz; Kris Maes; Prokar Dasgupta; Vipul Patel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.