Yakir S Levin1, Michael P Grant2, Eric Glassford2, Brett J Green3, Angela R Lemons4, Mathew M Avram1. 1. Department of Dermatology, Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch, Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, Ohio. 3. Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia. 4. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is increasing awareness of the potential hazards of surgical plumes. The plume associated with laser tattoo removal remains uncharacterized. OBJECTIVE: To determine the gaseous, particulate, and microbiological content of the laser tattoo removal plume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Air sampling was performed during laser tattoo removal from pig skin and from patients. Measurement of metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen sulfide (HS), and ultrafine particulates (UPs) as well as bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing were performed. RESULTS: Metals were identified in the plume from both pig and human skin. Volatile organic compounds were found at similar levels within and outside the treatment room. Several bacterial phyla were detected in the treatment room, but not outside. High levels of UPs were measured throughout the treatment room during tattoo removal from pig skin. Ultrafine particulates were detected at low levels in the room periphery during tattoo removal from human skin, but at higher levels in the immediate treatment zone. HS and CO were not detected. CONCLUSION: Metals, VOCs, HS, and CO were found at levels below applicable occupational exposure limits. The presence of bacteria is of uncertain significance, but may be hazardous. High levels of UPs require further investigation.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing awareness of the potential hazards of surgical plumes. The plume associated with laser tattoo removal remains uncharacterized. OBJECTIVE: To determine the gaseous, particulate, and microbiological content of the laser tattoo removal plume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Air sampling was performed during laser tattoo removal from pig skin and from patients. Measurement of metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen sulfide (HS), and ultrafine particulates (UPs) as well as bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing were performed. RESULTS: Metals were identified in the plume from both pig and human skin. Volatile organic compounds were found at similar levels within and outside the treatment room. Several bacterial phyla were detected in the treatment room, but not outside. High levels of UPs were measured throughout the treatment room during tattoo removal from pig skin. Ultrafine particulates were detected at low levels in the room periphery during tattoo removal from human skin, but at higher levels in the immediate treatment zone. HS and CO were not detected. CONCLUSION: Metals, VOCs, HS, and CO were found at levels below applicable occupational exposure limits. The presence of bacteria is of uncertain significance, but may be hazardous. High levels of UPs require further investigation.
Authors: J M Garden; M K O'Banion; L S Shelnitz; K S Pinski; A D Bakus; M E Reichmann; J P Sundberg Journal: JAMA Date: 1988-02-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kendra Broadwater; Marie A de Perio; Jennifer Roberts; Nancy C Burton; Angela R Lemons; Brett J Green; Scott E Brueck Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Gary S Chuang; William Farinelli; David C Christiani; Robert F Herrick; Norman C Y Lee; Mathew M Avram Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Geoffrey D Hannigan; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Amanda S Tyldsley; Qi Zheng; Brendan P Hodkinson; Adam J SanMiguel; Samuel Minot; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth A Grice Journal: mBio Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 7.867