Literature DB >> 9779533

A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain. Reexamining priorities.

J M Borkan1, B Koes, S Reis, D C Cherkin.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Consensus process.
OBJECTIVES: Reexamining and redirecting the research agenda for low back pain in primary care. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most research, publications, and funding have traditionally been directed toward specialty and biologically oriented investigations of "spinal disorders" from biomedical and biomechanical perspectives. Beginning in the mid-1980s, primary care researchers began to investigate this field in earnest, focusing on lower back pain as a pain syndrome within an individual, family, and community context. Unfortunately, more progress has been made on what should not be done in diagnosing and treating lower back pain than on what should be done.
METHODS: This was a modified group process designed to reach consensus among an international group of primary care lower back pain researchers.
RESULTS: Nearly all of the research priorities from the initial 1995 forum are still thought to be important, although only modest progress has been made on most of them. The priorities perceived to be the most feasible to investigate and the ones in which the greatest strides have been achieved are in methodologic rather than substantive areas. Identifying subgroups of people with lower back pain is still given top ranking in 1997, but the priorities have changed dramatically. Greater emphasis is given to finding predictors and risk factors for lower back pain chronicity, improving self-care strategies, and stimulating self-reliance. New items now make up 50% of the top 10 priorities. In general, the additions reflect a greater emphasis on expanding methodologic avenues of inquiry.
CONCLUSIONS: Methodologic advances, the enlistment of new techniques and disciplines, and redirected research efforts may facilitate progress in the diagnosis and treatment of lower back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9779533     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  35 in total

1.  Ambiguous relation between physical workload and low back pain: a twin control study.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; K O Kyvik; C Leboeuf-Yde; S Lings; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Johan Bring; Anneli Sjöblom; Karin Sundell; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Subgroup-specific therapy of low back pain: description and validity of two classification systems].

Authors:  A Schäfer; N Gärtner-Tschacher; T Schöttker-Königer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  The use of "stabilization exercises" to affect neuromuscular control in the lumbopelvic region: a narrative review.

Authors:  Paul Bruno
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

Review 6.  Exercise for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of low back pain in the workplace: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Ann Bell; Angus Burnett
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-14

Review 7.  Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kent; Hanne L Mjøsund; Ditte H D Petersen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Research methods for subgrouping low back pain.

Authors:  Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain.

Authors:  Tim Mitchell; Peter B O'Sullivan; Angus F Burnett; Leon Straker; Anne Smith
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Does physical activity change predict functional recovery in low back pain? Protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Hendrick; Stephan Milosavljevic; Melanie L Bell; Leigh Hale; Deirdre A Hurley; Suzanne M McDonough; Markus Melloh; David G Baxter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.