Literature DB >> 12554838

Ambiguous relation between physical workload and low back pain: a twin control study.

J Hartvigsen1, K O Kyvik, C Leboeuf-Yde, S Lings, L Bakketeig.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the association between self reported physical workload and low back pain (LBP) in younger twins. To investigate whether genetic factors interact with physical workload in relation to LBP.
METHODS: A twin control study was performed within a population based twin register using 1910 complete monozygotic (MZ) and same sexed dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs aged 25-42 and discordant for LBP. LBP in the affected twins was divided into two groups: "LBP for </=30 days during the past year", and "LBP for >30 days during the past year". Physical workload was divided into four categories: "sitting", "sitting/walking", "light physical", and "heavy physical". Data were analysed in a matched design using conditional logistic regression. MZ and DZ twins were analysed separately and together in order to determine possible genetic influences in relation to physical workload and LBP.
RESULTS: Statistically significant graded relations were found for increasing workload and LBP of longer duration but not for LBP of shorter duration (</=30 days during the past year). In both LBP groups the "sitting" and "sitting/walking" groups were not statistically different. MZ and DZ twins did not differ significantly with respect to LBP in the various workload groups.
CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence for a dose-response relation between physical workload and LBP of longer duration. Attention to clinically relevant subgroups based on duration, for example, is necessary in epidemiological studies dealing with LBP. Physical workload might be more important than genetic factors in LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12554838      PMCID: PMC1740454          DOI: 10.1136/oem.60.2.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  28 in total

Review 1.  Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Evaluation of questionnaire-based information on previous physical work loads. Stockholm MUSIC 1 Study Group. Musculoskeletal Intervention Center.

Authors:  M Torgén; J Winkel; L Alfredsson; A Kilbom
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  Is sitting-while-at-work associated with low back pain? A systematic, critical literature review.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; C Leboeuf-Yde; S Lings; E H Corder
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Low back pain and lifestyle. Part II--Obesity. Information from a population-based sample of 29,424 twin subjects.

Authors:  C Leboeuf-Yde; K O Kyvik; N H Bruun
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Juvenile lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus in monozygotic twins.

Authors:  H Matsui; H Tsuji; N Terahata
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Exposure assessment--a challenge for occupational epidemiology.

Authors:  T Kauppinen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Why has the search for causes of low back pain largely been nonconclusive?

Authors:  C Leboeuf-Yde; J M Lauritsen; T Lauritzen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Multivariate analysis for matched case-control studies.

Authors:  T R Holford; C White; J L Kelsey
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Is work status of low back pain patients best described by an automated device or by a questionnaire?

Authors:  P Loisel; S Poitras; J Lemaire; P Durand; A Southière; L Abenhaim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Association between sitting and occupational LBP.

Authors:  Angela Maria Lis; Katia M Black; Hayley Korn; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Sedentary lifestyle as a risk factor for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shu-Mei Chen; Mei-Fang Liu; Jill Cook; Shona Bass; Sing Kai Lo
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Modest associations between self-reported physical workload and neck trouble: a population-based twin control study.

Authors:  Jonas Winkel Holm; Jan Hartvigsen; Svend Lings; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Back and neck pain in seniors-prevalence and impact.

Authors:  Jan Hartvigsen; Henrik Frederiksen; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Stability of low back pain reporting over 8 years in a general population aged 40/41 years at base-line: data from three consecutive cross-sectional surveys.

Authors:  Nadège Lemeunier; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Per Kjaer; Olivier Gagey
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Self-reported hard physical work combined with heavy smoking or overweight may result in so-called Modic changes.

Authors:  Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Per Kjaer; Tom Bendix; Claus Manniche
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.