Literature DB >> 9777681

Strength training. Single versus multiple sets.

R N Carpinelli1, R M Otto.   

Abstract

Perhaps the most controversial element of any strength training programme is the number of sets required to increase muscular strength and hypertrophy. There is a prevalent belief that at least 3 sets of each exercise are required to elicit optimal increases in strength and hypertrophy. However, most of the studies that reported the results of training with single versus multiple sets do not substantiate this tenet. In fact, the preponderance of evidence suggests that for training durations of 4 to 25 weeks there is no significant difference in the increase in strength or hypertrophy as a result of training with single versus multiple sets. Because of the design limitations of these studies, conclusions concerning the efficacy of multiple sets should be tentative. However, there is little scientific evidence, and no theoretical physiological basis, to suggest that a greater volume of exercise elicits greater increases in strength or hypertrophy. This information may represent an important practical application of time-efficient, low-volume exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9777681     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199826020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  23 in total

1.  Strength training accelerates gastrointestinal transit in middle-aged and older men.

Authors:  K H Koffler; A Menkes; R A Redmond; W E Whitehead; R E Pratley; B F Hurley
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Effects of strength training on muscle hypertrophy and muscle cell disruption in older men.

Authors:  B F Hurley; R A Redmond; R E Pratley; M S Treuth; M A Rogers; A P Goldberg
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Nautilus vs universal gym strength training in adult males.

Authors:  A E Coleman
Journal:  Am Correct Ther J       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug

4.  Resistance Training: Exercise Prescription (Part 4 of 4).

Authors:  W J Kraemer; S J Fleck
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Weight training and strength, cardiorespiratory functioning and body composition of men.

Authors:  C M Reid; R A Yeater; I H Ullrich
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Effect of varied weight-training loads on the strength of university freshmen.

Authors:  R T Withers
Journal:  Res Q       Date:  1970-03

7.  Effects of strength training on bone mineral density: hormonal and bone turnover relationships.

Authors:  A S Ryan; M S Treuth; M A Rubin; J P Miller; B J Nicklas; D M Landis; R E Pratley; C R Libanati; C M Gundberg; B F Hurley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1994-10

8.  Frequency and volume of resistance training: effect on cervical extension strength.

Authors:  M L Pollock; J E Graves; M M Bamman; S H Leggett; D M Carpenter; C Carr; J Cirulli; J Matkozich; M Fulton
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Appropriate strength training.

Authors:  W A Lillegard; J D Terrio
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.456

10.  Strength training increases insulin action in healthy 50- to 65-yr-old men.

Authors:  J P Miller; R E Pratley; A P Goldberg; P Gordon; M Rubin; M S Treuth; A S Ryan; B F Hurley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1994-09
View more
  18 in total

1.  Strength training: single versus multiple sets.

Authors:  R Byrd; T J Chandler; M S Conley; A C Fry; G G Haff; A Koch; F Hatfield; K B Kirksey; J McBride; T McBride; H Newton; H S OBryant; M H Stone; K C Pierce; S Plisk; M Ritchie-Stone; D Wathen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Movement velocity in resistance training.

Authors:  Marta I R Pereira; Paulo S C Gomes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 4.  Musculoskeletal fitness, health outcomes and quality of life.

Authors:  R T Kell; G Bell; A Quinney
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Force-velocity, impulse-momentum relationships: implications for efficacy of purposefully slow resistance training.

Authors:  Brian K Schilling; Michael J Falvo; Loren Z F Chiu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  An integer programming model for optimizing shoulder rehabilitation.

Authors:  Christopher J Gatti; Jason Scibek; Oleg Svintsitski; James E Carpenter; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Uncomplicated resistance training and health-related outcomes: evidence for a public health mandate.

Authors:  Stuart M Phillips; Richard A Winett
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.733

8.  Comparison of once-weekly and twice-weekly strength training in older adults.

Authors:  J DiFrancisco-Donoghue; W Werner; P C Douris
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  The effects of varying time under tension and volume load on acute neuromuscular responses.

Authors:  Quan T Tran; David Docherty; David Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Effects of low volume resistance and cardiovascular training on strength and aerobic capacity in unfit men and women: a demonstration of a threshold model.

Authors:  Richard A Winett; Janet R Wojcik; Lesley D Fox; William G Herbert; Jennifer S Blevins; Ralph N Carpinelli
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.