Literature DB >> 22518835

Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Cameron J Mitchell1, Tyler A Churchward-Venne, Daniel W D West, Nicholas A Burd, Leigh Breen, Steven K Baker, Stuart M Phillips.   

Abstract

We have reported that the acute postexercise increases in muscle protein synthesis rates, with differing nutritional support, are predictive of longer-term training-induced muscle hypertrophy. Here, we aimed to test whether the same was true with acute exercise-mediated changes in muscle protein synthesis. Eighteen men (21 ± 1 yr, 22.6 ± 2.1 kg/m(2); means ± SE) had their legs randomly assigned to two of three training conditions that differed in contraction intensity [% of maximal strength (1 repetition maximum)] or contraction volume (1 or 3 sets of repetitions): 30%-3, 80%-1, and 80%-3. Subjects trained each leg with their assigned regime for a period of 10 wk, 3 times/wk. We made pre- and posttraining measures of strength, muscle volume by magnetic resonance (MR) scans, as well as pre- and posttraining biopsies of the vastus lateralis, and a single postexercise (1 h) biopsy following the first bout of exercise, to measure signaling proteins. Training-induced increases in MR-measured muscle volume were significant (P < 0.01), with no difference between groups: 30%-3 = 6.8 ± 1.8%, 80%-1 = 3.2 ± 0.8%, and 80%-3= 7.2 ± 1.9%, P = 0.18. Isotonic maximal strength gains were not different between 80%-1 and 80%-3, but were greater than 30%-3 (P = 0.04), whereas training-induced isometric strength gains were significant but not different between conditions (P = 0.92). Biopsies taken 1 h following the initial resistance exercise bout showed increased phosphorylation (P < 0.05) of p70S6K only in the 80%-1 and 80%-3 conditions. There was no correlation between phosphorylation of any signaling protein and hypertrophy. In accordance with our previous acute measurements of muscle protein synthetic rates a lower load lifted to failure resulted in similar hypertrophy as a heavy load lifted to failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22518835      PMCID: PMC3404827          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  41 in total

1.  High responders to resistance exercise training demonstrate differential regulation of skeletal muscle microRNA expression.

Authors:  Peter K Davidsen; Iain J Gallagher; Joseph W Hartman; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Flemming Dela; Jørn W Helge; James A Timmons; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-10-28

Review 2.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signalling molecule phosphorylation in young men.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Andrew M Holwerda; Keegan C Selby; Daniel W D West; Aaron W Staples; Nathan E Cain; Joshua G A Cashaback; James R Potvin; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Low-volume resistance exercise attenuates the decline in strength and muscle mass associated with immobilization.

Authors:  Bryan R Oates; Elisa I Glover; Daniel W West; Jessica L Fry; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Resistance exercise-induced increases in putative anabolic hormones do not enhance muscle protein synthesis or intracellular signalling in young men.

Authors:  Daniel W D West; Gregory W Kujbida; Daniel R Moore; Philip Atherton; Nicholas A Burd; Jan P Padzik; Michael De Lisio; Jason E Tang; Gianni Parise; Michael J Rennie; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Exercise training and protein metabolism: influences of contraction, protein intake, and sex-based differences.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Jason E Tang; Daniel R Moore; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-11-26

7.  Elevations in ostensibly anabolic hormones with resistance exercise enhance neither training-induced muscle hypertrophy nor strength of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Jason E Tang; Daniel R Moore; Aaron W Staples; Andrew M Holwerda; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-11-12

8.  Age-related differences in the dose-response relationship of muscle protein synthesis to resistance exercise in young and old men.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Anna Selby; Debbie Rankin; Rekha Patel; Philip Atherton; Wulf Hildebrandt; John Williams; Kenneth Smith; Olivier Seynnes; Natalie Hiscock; Michael J Rennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Associations of exercise-induced hormone profiles and gains in strength and hypertrophy in a large cohort after weight training.

Authors:  Daniel W D West; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Daniel W D West; Aaron W Staples; Philip J Atherton; Jeff M Baker; Daniel R Moore; Andrew M Holwerda; Gianni Parise; Michael J Rennie; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  167 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction on Upper-Body Musculature Located Distal and Proximal to Applied Pressure.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Matthew B Jessee; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Motor unit recruitment cannot be inferred from surface EMG amplitude and basic reporting standards must be adhered to.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Dan Ogborn; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Intramuscular Anabolic Signaling and Endocrine Response Following Resistance Exercise: Implications for Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Adam M Gonzalez; Jay R Hoffman; Jeffrey R Stout; David H Fukuda; Darryn S Willoughby
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effects of exercise intensity and occlusion pressure after 12 weeks of resistance training with blood-flow restriction.

Authors:  Manoel E Lixandrão; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Gilberto Laurentino; Cleiton A Libardi; André Y Aihara; Fabiano N Cardoso; Valmor Tricoli; Hamilton Roschel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Superior mitochondrial adaptations in human skeletal muscle after interval compared to continuous single-leg cycling matched for total work.

Authors:  Martin J MacInnis; Evelyn Zacharewicz; Brian J Martin; Maria E Haikalis; Lauren E Skelly; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Robyn M Murphy; Martin J Gibala
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Neuromuscular adaptations following 12-week maximal voluntary co-contraction training.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Yasuhide Yoshitake; Yohei Takai; Tetsuo Fukunaga; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Acute low-load resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction increased protein signalling and number of satellite cells in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; William Apro; Gøran Paulsen; Tormod S Nilsen; Eva Blomstrand; Truls Raastad
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Author's reply to Steele and Fisher: "Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?": the importance of maintaining objectivity in drawing evidence-based conclusions.

Authors:  B Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Arterial compliance and stiffness following low-intensity resistance exercise.

Authors:  Takanobu Okamoto; Seokki Min; Mikako Sakamaki-Sunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Effect of low-load resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction to volitional fatigue on muscle swelling.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yasuda; Kazuya Fukumura; Haruko Iida; Toshiaki Nakajima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.