Literature DB >> 9777499

The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction.

K Tavakoli1, W R Walsh, F Bonar, R Smart, S Wulf, M D Poole.   

Abstract

Even though osteodistraction has been well established in the extremities, the parameters used in craniofacial distraction have been essentially borrowed from orthopaedic experience. Latency is widely practised but its relevance has not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to establish the role of latency in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Twenty-two growing Wethers sheep were allocated to four experimental groups. Six animals were allocated to each of Groups A, B and C and underwent bilateral mandibular corticotomies and attachment of an external lengthening device. Latent periods of 0, 4 and 7 days respectively were observed prior to beginning distraction. The distraction protocol consisted of a rate of 0.5 mm twice daily for 20 days, followed by a consolidation phase of 20 days after which the sheep were killed. Histology, bone densitometry and 3-point mechanical testing were performed on the harvested mandibles. Group D formed the control group (n = 4). Histologically, the distracted bone exhibited bone formation primarily via intramembranous ossification with scattered islands of cartilage. The regenerated bone had mechanical properties significantly weaker than the undistracted control group (P < 0.05), but between the experimental groups no statistically significant differences were demonstrable either in mechanical strength or DEXA density. These data indicate that a change in latency does not alter the properties of the regenerated bone in mandibular distraction osteogenesis and indeed no latent interval may be necessary at all in craniofacial distraction. This has implications for the duration of device fixation in distraction procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9777499     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(98)80016-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

1.  Gray-scale ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone callus in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: initial findings.

Authors:  Costanza Bruno; Salvatore Minniti; Editta Buttura-da-Prato; Massimo Albanese; Pier Francesco Nocini; Roberto Pozzi-Mucelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Matthew E Lawler; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 4.  Orthodontic or surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Antônio Luís Neto Custódio
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-09

5.  Automating skeletal expansion: An implant for distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

Authors:  John C Magill; Marten F Byl; Batya Goldwaser; Maria Papadaki; Roger Kromann; Brent Yates; Joseph R Morency; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.582

6.  The effect of latency on bone lengthening force and bone mineralization: an investigation using strain gauge mounted on internal distractor device.

Authors:  Sekou Singare; Dichen Li; Yaxiong Liu; Zhongying Wu; Jue Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A preliminary study of hardness and modulus of elasticity in sheep mandibles submitted to distraction osteogenesis and low-level laser therapy.

Authors:  Angelo-Luiz Freddo; Roberto Hübler; Carlos-Afonso de Castro-Beck; Cláiton Heitz; Marília-Gerhardt de Oliveira
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-01-01

Review 8.  The biology of distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular and craniomaxillofacial defects: A review.

Authors:  Subodh Shankar Natu; Iqbal Ali; Sarwar Alam; Kolli Yada Giri; Anshita Agarwal; Vrishali Ajit Kulkarni
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.